Triple Riding On Motorcycle Not Automatic Proof Of Contributory Negligence; High Court Can Enhance Award Even Without Cross-Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Statutory Power To Lay Electricity Lines Prevails Over Private Land Claims; Landowners Entitled To Compensation, Not Obstruction: Bombay High Court Beer & Whisky Are Allied/Cognate Goods; Use Of Identical Mark For Spirits Infringes 'Godfather' Beer Trademark: Delhi High Court Minimum Percentile Fixed By Indian Nursing Council For B.Sc. Nursing Admissions Must Be Strictly Adhered To; Cannot Be Diluted Without Approval: Calcutta High Court Bride Not Expected To Keep All Gold In Personal Custody In Matrimonial Home; Entrustment To Husband Presumed: Kerala High Court Default Imprisonment Not Additional Punishment But Coercive Measure To Secure Fine; Cannot Become 'De Facto' Debtors' Prison: Karnataka High Court Mahant Is Only A Custodian Of Deity’s Property, Assets Gifted For Temple Maintenance Belong To Public Trust: Gujarat High Court Pendency Of Criminal Antecedents Alone Not A Ground To Deny Bail: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail In Abduction Case After 3-Year Delay In FIR Beer Falls Under ‘IMFL’ Category; No Obligation To Collect TCS On Sales Prior To June 2003: Telangana High Court Dismissal From Service For Negligence Without Proved Misappropriation Is Disproportionate: Orissa High Court Merit In A Case Does Not Justify Disregarding Statutory Delay: NCDRC Upholds Dismissal Of Star Health's Appeal Filed With 442-Day Delay Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Arbitration Act Commences Only From Receipt Of Signed Copy Of Award: Madhya Pradesh High Court Government Employee Not Eligible For Regular Promotion During Pendency Of Vigilance Proceeding: Orissa High Court Arrest Warrants Against Directors Under Section 72 CP Act Should Be Last Resort; Proper Procedure Must Be Followed: NCDRC

Supreme Court Addresses Serious Administrative Irregularities in Patna High Court; Grants Time for Regular Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 2, 2023 – In a recent judgment dated September 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple issues, including a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and a grave administrative error originating from the High Court of Patna.

The bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition and allowed the petition to proceed without a certified/plain copy of the impugned order. The Court granted the petitioner, Manish Kumar, four weeks to surrender and apply for regular bail, stating that the application would be considered “in accordance with law.”

One of the most significant aspects of this judgment was the Court’s attention to a “serious irregularity” in the administrative process of the High Court of Patna. The impugned order, dated April 20, 2023, had not been made available to the aggrieved party, violating procedural norms. The Court noted that a screenshot from the High Court’s website, submitted by the petitioner, indicated that the status of the case was “disposed of,” yet the copy of the order was unavailable.

In light of this, the Supreme Court directed the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to investigate the matter and take necessary corrective actions. This directive intends to address and rectify the concerning lack of transparency and administrative efficiency in the High Court’s procedures.

All pending applications related to the case have been disposed of in accordance with the Court’s directives.

The judgment did not specify any referred cases, sections, acts, or rules beyond the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

This case underlines the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring procedural justice and administrative efficiency in India’s judicial system.

D.D-01-09-2023

MANISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR           

Latest Legal News