Sold Property During Pending Appeal, Defied Court Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sends Man To Jail For Contempt Hostile Witness Cannot Erase a Bribe Demand Already Made on Record: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Ration Officer Three Decades of Unpaid Wages: Supreme Court Strips Gannon Dunkerley of Control Over Sick Company's Assets, Appoints Administrator to Pay Workers by August 2026 Gram Nyayalaya Cannot Touch Family Court's Maintenance Orders — Allahabad High Court Draws the Line Caste Abuse Allegation at Village Jatra Is Counter-Blast to Earlier Machete Attack: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Despite SC/ST Act Bar Contributory Negligence | Not Wearing a Helmet Does Not Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Madras High Court Air Force Can't Punish Officer After Criminal Court Sets Him Free: Supreme Court Overturns 30-Year-Old Dismissal Written Statement Without Affidavit of Admission/Denial: Non-Est Filing or Curable Defect? Delhi High Court Refers Conflicting Views to Larger Bench Bank's Negligence Killed Cheque Bounce Case Before It Could Begin: Supreme Court Rules Section 138 Remedy Lost Due to Stale Cheques Bank Letting Your Cheques Go Stale Is Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Benefit Of Probation Act Available Even If Offender Is Sentenced Solely To Fine: Supreme Court Reporting Registration Of FIR Based On Public Records Does Not Violate Right To Privacy: Sikkim High Court CBSE Cannot Cancel Class XII Results Based on Similar MCQ Answers Alone Without Any Report of Malpractice From Examination Centre: Orissa High Court

Supreme Court Addresses Serious Administrative Irregularities in Patna High Court; Grants Time for Regular Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 2, 2023 – In a recent judgment dated September 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple issues, including a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and a grave administrative error originating from the High Court of Patna.

The bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition and allowed the petition to proceed without a certified/plain copy of the impugned order. The Court granted the petitioner, Manish Kumar, four weeks to surrender and apply for regular bail, stating that the application would be considered “in accordance with law.”

One of the most significant aspects of this judgment was the Court’s attention to a “serious irregularity” in the administrative process of the High Court of Patna. The impugned order, dated April 20, 2023, had not been made available to the aggrieved party, violating procedural norms. The Court noted that a screenshot from the High Court’s website, submitted by the petitioner, indicated that the status of the case was “disposed of,” yet the copy of the order was unavailable.

In light of this, the Supreme Court directed the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to investigate the matter and take necessary corrective actions. This directive intends to address and rectify the concerning lack of transparency and administrative efficiency in the High Court’s procedures.

All pending applications related to the case have been disposed of in accordance with the Court’s directives.

The judgment did not specify any referred cases, sections, acts, or rules beyond the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

This case underlines the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring procedural justice and administrative efficiency in India’s judicial system.

D.D-01-09-2023

MANISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR           

Latest Legal News