Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

Supreme Court Addresses Serious Administrative Irregularities in Patna High Court; Grants Time for Regular Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 2, 2023 – In a recent judgment dated September 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple issues, including a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and a grave administrative error originating from the High Court of Patna.

The bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition and allowed the petition to proceed without a certified/plain copy of the impugned order. The Court granted the petitioner, Manish Kumar, four weeks to surrender and apply for regular bail, stating that the application would be considered “in accordance with law.”

One of the most significant aspects of this judgment was the Court’s attention to a “serious irregularity” in the administrative process of the High Court of Patna. The impugned order, dated April 20, 2023, had not been made available to the aggrieved party, violating procedural norms. The Court noted that a screenshot from the High Court’s website, submitted by the petitioner, indicated that the status of the case was “disposed of,” yet the copy of the order was unavailable.

In light of this, the Supreme Court directed the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to investigate the matter and take necessary corrective actions. This directive intends to address and rectify the concerning lack of transparency and administrative efficiency in the High Court’s procedures.

All pending applications related to the case have been disposed of in accordance with the Court’s directives.

The judgment did not specify any referred cases, sections, acts, or rules beyond the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

This case underlines the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring procedural justice and administrative efficiency in India’s judicial system.

D.D-01-09-2023

MANISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR           

Latest Legal News