Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Stays Trial Court's Discharge Order - Mini-Trial at the Stage of Framing of Charge is Impermissible: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi stayed an order of the Trial Court which had discharged the accused Harpreet Singh Khalsa and others in a murder case. The High Court's order came in response to a revision petition filed by the State (NCT of Delhi). In its judgment, the court emphasized that a "mini-trial at the stage of framing of charge is impermissible," pointing to the Trial Court's erroneous approach.

The case in question pertains to the discharge of accused Harpreet Singh Khalsa and others from charges including murder under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC. The accused were initially implicated in an FIR registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, involving a murder that was discovered after police were alerted about foul smell emanating from a flat.

Justice Vikas Mahajan, while delivering the order, pointed out that the Trial Court's methodology was problematic. He stated, "It prima facie appears that the learned Trial Court has overlooked evidence in the form of CCTV footage and CDRs and has undertaken the exercise of finding out probative and evidentiary value of the evidence on record, which is not permissible."

The court also criticized the Trial Court for dismissing Call Detail Records (CDRs) and overlooking the significance of CCTV footage in the case. "There are CDRs on record which show that all accused persons were in regular touch with each other but the learned Trial Court has negated the said CDRs," said the judgment.

Drawing attention to Supreme Court precedents, the High Court clarified that it had the authority to suspend the Trial Court's order. "In view of the above and having regard to the submissions made by the learned senior counsel, which prima facie appear to have substance, the operation of the impugned order is stayed, till the next date of hearing," the order read.

The High Court has issued notice to the respondents, returnable on December 13, 2023. Meanwhile, the impugned order's operation remains stayed. A copy of the High Court's order has been forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance.

This landmark judgment has set a precedent for how to approach the framing of charges and emphasized the need for judicial scrutiny at early stages of criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: October 21, 2023

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) vs HARPREET SINGH KHALSA AND ORS. 

Similar News