Plaintiff In Title Suit Must Prove Own Case On Independent Evidence, Cannot Rely On Weakness Of Defence: Supreme Court Advocate Commissioner's Failure To Localize Land Per Title Deeds Fatal To Encroachment Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court Enmity Is A Double-Edged Weapon, Can Be Motive For False Implication As Much As For Crime: Allahabad High Court Parity In Bail: Karnataka High Court Grants Relief To Accused In Robbery Case As Mastermind & Main Offenders Were Already Enlarged Specific Performance Denied If Buyer Fails To Prove Continuous Readiness With Funds; Part-Payment Can't Be Forfeited Without Specific Clause: Delhi High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept In Police Stations For Long, Courts Must Judiciously Exercise Power To Release On Supurdagi: Madhya Pradesh High Court Prolonged Incarceration Militates Against Article 21, Constitutional Principles Must Override Section 37 NDPS Rigors: Punjab & Haryana High Court Onus On Individual To Prove Claim Of 'Fear Of Religious Persecution' For Exemption Under Foreigners Act: Calcutta High Court Direct Recruits Cannot Claim Seniority From A Date Prior To Their Entry Into The Cadre: Orissa High Court Sale Deed Executed After Land Vests In State Confers No Title; Post-Vesting Purchaser Can’t Claim Compensation: Calcutta High Court No Right To Blanket Regularization For Contractual Staff; State Must Timely Fill Sanctioned Vacancies Under Reserved Quota: Supreme Court Non-Signatory Collaborator Under 'Deed Of Joint Undertaking' Can Invoke Arbitration Clause As A 'Veritable Party': Supreme Court Insolvency Proceedings Cannot Be Used As Coercive Recovery Mechanism For Complex Contractual Disputes: Supreme Court Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To Sale Cannot Challenge Transfer Under PTCL Act After Long Delay: Supreme Court SC/ST Act | Proceedings To Annul Sale Illegal If Initiated By Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To The Transaction: Supreme Court Consumers Cannot Be Burdened With Tariff Charges Beyond Period Of Service Delivery: Supreme Court Mere Non-Production Of Old Selection Records Or Non-Publication Of All Candidates' Marks No Ground To Direct Appointment: Supreme Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal In Sohrabuddin Shaikh Encounter Case; Says Prosecution Failed To Prove Conspiracy Dishonour Of Cheque Due To Signature Mismatch Or Incomplete Signature Attracts Section 138 NI Act: Supreme Court 138 NI Act | High Court Cannot Let Off Accused In NI Act Case By Ordering Only Cheque Amount Payment Without Interest Or Penalty: Supreme Court

SSP Ferozepur Failed To Discharge His Duties In Ensuring Security Of PM During His Punjab Visit – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice Indu Malhotra, a former judge on the Supreme Court, had been selected earlier by the court to conduct the investigation. The Prime Minister was stranded at a flyover in Bhatinda, Punjab, on January 5 after a group of farmers protesters stopped the roadway, which is the subject of the controversy.

 The Supreme Court remarked  that Harmandeep Singh Hans, the SSP for Punjab, had failed to carry out his responsibilities in guaranteeing the security of the Prime Minister during his visit to Punjab in January 2022, according to the committee that the Supreme Court had established. The bench led by Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana heard the petition, which demanded an inquiry into the security failure during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Punjab in January 2022.

During the hearings, CJI Ramana read from the committee's findings, which said that Harmandeep Singh Hans, Punjab's SSP for Ferozpur, had neglected to carry out his responsibilities and enlarge the route despite having the time and resources on hand to do so. According to the investigation, the SSP disregarded orders before to the PM's entrance despite having been given clear direction. A committee should be established to conduct recurring reviews of the "Blue Book," according to the committee report.

The  Committee has turned in its Report under a sealed cover . The courtroom unsealed the sealed cover, and read out some of the report's recommendations. The Report was then re-sealed and preserved in the safe custody of this Court's Secretary General, who will make it available as and when the Court requests.

And  instruct the Registry to forward copies of the Report to the Central and State Governments for follow-up action.

The Court noted that there is also a greater need to develop fresh strategies that could prevent such oversights from happening again in the future.

Lawyers Voice

Vs

Union of India

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/971_2022_1_302_37693_Order_25-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News