SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

SSP Ferozepur Failed To Discharge His Duties In Ensuring Security Of PM During His Punjab Visit – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice Indu Malhotra, a former judge on the Supreme Court, had been selected earlier by the court to conduct the investigation. The Prime Minister was stranded at a flyover in Bhatinda, Punjab, on January 5 after a group of farmers protesters stopped the roadway, which is the subject of the controversy.

 The Supreme Court remarked  that Harmandeep Singh Hans, the SSP for Punjab, had failed to carry out his responsibilities in guaranteeing the security of the Prime Minister during his visit to Punjab in January 2022, according to the committee that the Supreme Court had established. The bench led by Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana heard the petition, which demanded an inquiry into the security failure during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Punjab in January 2022.

During the hearings, CJI Ramana read from the committee's findings, which said that Harmandeep Singh Hans, Punjab's SSP for Ferozpur, had neglected to carry out his responsibilities and enlarge the route despite having the time and resources on hand to do so. According to the investigation, the SSP disregarded orders before to the PM's entrance despite having been given clear direction. A committee should be established to conduct recurring reviews of the "Blue Book," according to the committee report.

The  Committee has turned in its Report under a sealed cover . The courtroom unsealed the sealed cover, and read out some of the report's recommendations. The Report was then re-sealed and preserved in the safe custody of this Court's Secretary General, who will make it available as and when the Court requests.

And  instruct the Registry to forward copies of the Report to the Central and State Governments for follow-up action.

The Court noted that there is also a greater need to develop fresh strategies that could prevent such oversights from happening again in the future.

Lawyers Voice

Vs

Union of India

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/971_2022_1_302_37693_Order_25-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News