Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction When Death Is Caused by an Unforeseeable Forest Fire, Criminal Prosecution Cannot Be Sustained Without Proof of Rashness, Negligence, or Knowledge: Supreme Court Proof of Accident Alone is Not Enough – Claimants Must Prove Involvement of Offending Vehicle Under Section 166 MV Act: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Compensation in Fatal Road Accident Case Income Tax | Search Means Search, Not ‘Other Person’: Section 153C Collapses When the Assessee Himself Is Searched: Karnataka High Court Draws a Clear Red Line License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD"

SSP Ferozepur Failed To Discharge His Duties In Ensuring Security Of PM During His Punjab Visit – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice Indu Malhotra, a former judge on the Supreme Court, had been selected earlier by the court to conduct the investigation. The Prime Minister was stranded at a flyover in Bhatinda, Punjab, on January 5 after a group of farmers protesters stopped the roadway, which is the subject of the controversy.

 The Supreme Court remarked  that Harmandeep Singh Hans, the SSP for Punjab, had failed to carry out his responsibilities in guaranteeing the security of the Prime Minister during his visit to Punjab in January 2022, according to the committee that the Supreme Court had established. The bench led by Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana heard the petition, which demanded an inquiry into the security failure during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Punjab in January 2022.

During the hearings, CJI Ramana read from the committee's findings, which said that Harmandeep Singh Hans, Punjab's SSP for Ferozpur, had neglected to carry out his responsibilities and enlarge the route despite having the time and resources on hand to do so. According to the investigation, the SSP disregarded orders before to the PM's entrance despite having been given clear direction. A committee should be established to conduct recurring reviews of the "Blue Book," according to the committee report.

The  Committee has turned in its Report under a sealed cover . The courtroom unsealed the sealed cover, and read out some of the report's recommendations. The Report was then re-sealed and preserved in the safe custody of this Court's Secretary General, who will make it available as and when the Court requests.

And  instruct the Registry to forward copies of the Report to the Central and State Governments for follow-up action.

The Court noted that there is also a greater need to develop fresh strategies that could prevent such oversights from happening again in the future.

Lawyers Voice

Vs

Union of India

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/971_2022_1_302_37693_Order_25-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News