Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Simply Mentioning Harassment in Suicide Note Insufficient to Invoke Section 306 IPC," Rules High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 306, 506, and 120-B IPC against Iqbal Singh Sandhu and others. The judgment, delivered by Justice Deepak Gupta, underscores the absence of specific allegations and prima facie evidence necessary to constitute an offense under Section 306 IPC. The decision was also influenced by a compromise reached between the parties involved.

The case stemmed from an FIR lodged by Paramjit Kaur, whose husband, Harnek Singh, committed suicide on July 15, 2018, using his licensed gun. The FIR alleged that Iqbal Singh Sandhu and others had harassed the deceased, leading him to take his own life. A suicide note left by Harnek Singh accused Iqbal Singh Sandhu of mental harassment and financial deceit. However, a prior financial settlement between the parties and a subsequent compromise played a crucial role in the court's decision to quash the FIR.

The court noted that the allegations in the FIR and the suicide note were vague and lacked specific details about how and when the harassment occurred. "Simply by mentioning in the suicide note that the accused harassed the deceased and is responsible for the commission of suicide by the deceased cannot be sufficient to invoke Section 306 IPC," Justice Deepak Gupta observed.

The judgment emphasized that for an offense under Section 306 IPC to be made out, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding the commission of suicide. The court referenced several Supreme Court rulings, including Gangula Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, to highlight that there must be an "active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option."

The petitioners presented a compromise agreement and a receipt indicating a financial settlement between Harnek Singh and Iqbal Singh Sandhu. The court found that this settlement, along with the lack of specific allegations, justified quashing the FIR. "Quashing of the proceedings would serve the solitary purpose of Section 482 Cr.P.C to prevent the abuse of the process of the law," the judgment stated.

The court relied on various precedents to elucidate the principles governing the quashing of FIRs in non-compoundable offenses. It noted that while heinous and serious offenses generally should not be quashed based on a compromise, the specific circumstances of each case must be considered. The judgment cited the Supreme Court's decision in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., which allows for quashing in cases predominantly civil or personal in nature, provided they do not have a serious societal impact.

Justice Deepak Gupta remarked, "The allegations set out in the FIR or the suicide note do not constitute the offense under Section 306 IPC. Therefore, the petitioners should not be compelled to undergo the rigmarole and ordeal of trial."

The High Court's decision to quash the FIR against Iqbal Singh Sandhu and others underscores the judiciary's commitment to preventing the misuse of legal processes. By emphasizing the necessity of specific allegations and prima facie evidence, the judgment sets a significant precedent for similar cases involving allegations of abetment to suicide. The ruling also highlights the court's willingness to consider compromises in non-heinous offenses, ensuring justice is served without unnecessary harassment of the accused.

 

Date of Decision: May 6, 2024

Iqbal Singh Sandhu And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors

Similar News