Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case Welfare of the Child is Paramount: Allahabad High Court Awards Custody to Biological Mother in Habeas Corpus Petition Due Process Followed Under Rule 3(b); No Error in Appointment Procedure: Calcutta High Court Denies Review in Temporary MMR Case Legitimacy Conferred by Section 16(1) of HMA: Madras High Court Upholds Partial Partition Claim Kerala High Court Voids Property Tax Demand Notices on Telecom Towers for Exceeding Limitation Period” Karnataka High Court directs government to pay compensation to long-term contractual employees in lieu of reinstatement and regularization. Execution Reports Are Crucial Before Issuing Non-Bailable Warrants: High Court of Jharkhand Quashes Warrants High Court Affirms J&K Bank’s Autonomy in Recruitment Policies, Suggests Inclusion of Ex-Servicemen” IT Act - Non-Issuance of Draft Assessment Order Renders Final Order Void, Delhi High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 2500 Crore Land Demand, Slams State for 'Commercialization Over Public Interest "Amendments Must Be Based on New Evidence, Not Repetitive Objections," Rules Himachal High Court No Error in Dismissing Petition to Call Original Agreement' in Cheque Bounce Case: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Trial Court’s Discretion Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Supreme Court Affirms Right to Horizontal Reservation for Disabled Candidates in Judicial Exams Patna High Court Upholds Rejection of Vehicle Release in Liquor Seizure Case, Cites Statutory Bar on Jurisdiction Pendency of Several Criminal Cases Cannot Be the Basis to Refuse Bail: P&H High Court in Counterfeit Currency Case “Consistency in Dying Declarations is Key to Conviction,” Rules Andhra Pradesh High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice: Sanction Not Obtained as Per Statutory Requirement Beneficial Legislation Like the DV Act Justifies Interim Relief Even After Prolonged Separation: Calcutta HC Defendant's Causal Approach Not Sufficient: Delhi High Court Dismisses Leave to Defend Application in Recovery Suit Mental Distance Between ‘May Be True’ and ‘Must Be True’” Requires Clear Evidence: High Court Overturns Conviction Leasehold Rights Expire with Lease Period: J&K High Court in Case Against J&K State Financial Corporation High Court Quashes Post-Retirement Pay Reduction: Emphasizes Natural Justice Revenue Authorities Have No Jurisdiction Over Title Disputes: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms 1938 Land Acquisition for Industrial Use NDPS | Extended Custody Unnecessary Where Seizure Is Intermediate and Investigation Concluded: Kerala High Court Adoption Severed All Ties with Biological Family – Madras High Court Upholds Legal Heirship Under Hindu Adoptions Act” Availability of Alternative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Before Seeking Judicial Intervention, MP High Court in Debt Recovery Case Balancing Speedy Trial and Justice: Additional Evidence Allowed,” says Orissa High Court in Death Penalty Case Recipient of Goods Can Seek Advance Ruling Under GST, Rules Rajasthan High Court Tender Terms and Conditions: Not Absolute, Cancellation Allowed in Public Interest: Telangana High Court Cancelled Tender for Redevelopment of Modern Abattoir Facility Supreme Court: “Mere Directorship Does Not Imply Liability” in National Housing Bank Case Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: PH High Court Affirms in Suicide Abetment Case Taxation Law l Period Spent Before Incorrect Forum Must Be Excluded from Limitation Calculation: Uttarakhand High Court in Refund Claim Case Timeliness in Alimony Payments Must be Maintained Despite Appeals: Orissa High Court Victim’s Deposition is of Sterling Quality in Spite of Her Tender Age and the Corroborative Medical Evidence: High Court of Sikkim Upholds Conviction in Aggravated Sexual Assault Case” No Decree Under Section 31 Can Be Passed: Raj High Court Overturns Lower Court’s Decree in Financial Corporation Case High Court Rules in Favor of Shehnaaz Gill, Declares Agreement with Sajjan Duhan Void Due to Misrepresentation No Clear Mens Rea or Direct Instigation : Orissa High Court Quashes Abetment to Suicide Charges

Similarity in sound could mislead consumers into believing that ‘VIGOURA’ is either a variant of, associated with, or endorsed by the makers of ‘VIAGRA’: Delhi High Court Restrains Use of ‘VIGOURA’

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling on trademark infringement and passing off today, has granted a permanent injunction against Renovision Exports Pvt. Ltd., preventing the use of the mark “VIGOURA” or any similar sounding mark. The order was passed after it was found that “VIGOURA” was phonetically, visually, and conceptually similar to “VIAGRA”, a registered trademark of Pfizer Products Inc., potentially leading to consumer confusion.

Pfizer Products Inc., recognized globally for its erectile dysfunction drug “VIAGRA”, argued that “VIGOURA” infringed upon its well-established trademark rights. Pfizer’s primary contention was based on the similarity of the marks which could mislead the consumers into associating the two products, despite one being an allopathic medicine and the other homeopathic.

Justice Sanjeev Narula noted the significant similarity between the two marks and the fact that both products target the same consumer segment, increasing the likelihood of confusion regarding the source and affiliation of the products. The judgment stated, “The trademarks ‘VIGOURA’ and ‘VIAGRA’ exhibit a high degree of phonetic similarity… This phonetic resemblance is particularly concerning in the pharmaceutical industry, where the precise identification of products is crucial for consumer safety and confidence.”

 

The court also held that Pfizer had established a transborder reputation of “VIAGRA” that extended into India prior to the Defendants’ adoption of “VIGOURA”, leading to a clear case of passing off. The Defendants’ use of “VIGOURA” was seen as a deliberate attempt to capitalize on the goodwill and reputation of “VIAGRA”.

While Pfizer sought damages of Rs. 20 lakhs, the court awarded nominal damages of Rs. 3,00,000 due to the absence of detailed evidence for specific loss amounts. Additionally, actual litigation costs were awarded to Pfizer, underlining the acknowledgment of infringement and passing off by the Defendants.

The judgment culminates in a strong reinforcement of trademark protections, particularly in industries where consumer health and safety are at stake. Pfizer’s victory underscores the importance of safeguarding global brand identities from potential infringement and confusion in different markets.

Date of Decision: May 1, 2024

Pfizer Products Inc. vs. Renovision Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Similar News