Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Sets Aside Order for Direct Transfer of Attached Property Ownership- P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, May 29, 2023 - In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Archana Puri, has set aside an order directing the transfer of ownership of an attached property in a decree holder's name. The case (CR-1319 of 2019) involved M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another as the petitioners, and Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others as respondents.

The dispute arose during the execution proceedings for the recovery of Rs. 44,10,440/- as per a judgment and decree issued on January 21, 2013. The decree holder filed an application seeking the transfer and sale of the attached property in their name, citing a lack of interested buyers. Consequently, the lower court issued a letter to the Tehsildar, directing the transfer of ownership to the decree holder for a sum of Rs. 60,20,000/-.

However, Justice Puri observed that the lower court's process was flawed. The court had bypassed the requirement for the decree holder's participation in the auction proceedings and ordered the direct transfer of ownership, which lacked legal provision. As a result, the High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the Executing Court.

The Executing Court has been directed to proceed with the execution from the stage of warrant of sale issuance for the attached property. If no bidders are found in the auction proceedings, the decree holder has been permitted to seek permission to participate in accordance with the law. The Executing Court has been instructed to facilitate the satisfaction of the decree.

Decided on: 29.05.2023

M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another vs Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others 

s[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/29-may23-Bassiarkh-Rice-Mills-vs-State-P^0H-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News