Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

“Service of Summons Should Include a Copy of the Plaint,” Supreme Court Dismisses National Insurance Company Ltd.’s Petition on Limitation Period

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 12, 2023 – In a significant ruling today, the Supreme Court of India clarified the requirements for the service of summons in civil suits. The apex court upheld that the service of summons “should include a copy of the plaint,” based on the Code of Civil Procedure, Order V Rule 2. The judgement came in the case between National Insurance Company Ltd. And M/S National Building Construction India Ltd & Others.

In the matter, National Insurance Company Ltd. Had petitioned the Supreme Court over the effective date for computing the limitation period for filing a written statement in a suit before the Delhi High Court, Commercial Division. Two modes of service were scrutinized: one through the bailiff and the other through speed post.

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi presided over the case. “We accept the petitioner’s argument on the legal proposition that service contemplated in terms of Order V Rule 2 of the Code would imply service of summons along with the copy of the plaint,” the bench stated in the judgement.

However, the Court did not interfere with the High Court’s factual determination, mentioning, “It is essentially a question of fact, which we do not want to reappreciate at this stage.” As a result, the petition filed by National Insurance Company Ltd. Was dismissed, and any pending applications were also disposed of.

The judgement clarifies the rules around the service of summons and underlines the importance of complying with procedural requirements in civil suits. Legal experts say the ruling could serve as a crucial reference for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision-12-09-2023

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. vs M/S NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INDIA LTD. & ORS.

Latest Legal News