Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Seniority Must Reflect in Pay, Not Just in Position: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that underscores the importance of equitable pay in government services, the High Court at Calcutta has set a precedent by addressing a long-standing pay anomaly issue. The Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, while delivering the judgment in the case of Uday Sankar Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors., emphasized, “Seniority must reflect in pay, not just in position,” offering a new ray of hope to government employees facing similar disparities.

The petitioner, Uday Sankar Das, a retired 'Process Server', challenged the disparity in pay compared to his junior, citing Rule 55(4) of the West Bengal Service Rules, Part-I. The rule stipulates that the pay of a senior government employee should be re-fixed at the same stage as a junior colleague if the latter draws a higher rate due to pay scale revision or under normal rules.

The court meticulously reviewed similar precedents, Including the case of Union of India & Ors. –Vs- Shri C.R. Madhava Murthy & Anr., reported in 2022 (4) Supreme 435, which resonates with the principle that seniors should not draw less pay than their juniors. Drawing parallels, Justice Chatterjee observed, “If it is found that any junior employee draws higher scale of pay than his senior of the same cadre, to remove the pay anomaly, the pay of such senior employee is required to be stepped up.”

However, the petitioner’s claim lacked direct documentary evidence comparing his service records with those of the junior colleague. Consequently, the court did not grant an immediate ruling in favor of the petitioner. Instead, Justice Chatterjee disposed of the petition with an innovative approach, granting the petitioner the liberty to submit a comprehensive representation to the learned District Judge, South 24 Parganas.

The learned District Judge Is directed to reassess the petitioner’s claim within eight weeks upon receiving the representation. This measure ensures a thorough review while providing an equitable opportunity for the petitioner to substantiate his claims.

 Date of Decision: 20.11.2023

 

Uday Sankar Das  VS The State of West bengal & Ors.

Latest Legal News