Allegations In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Specific And Supported By Foundation Facts To Avoid Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence To Period Already Undergone Citing Medical Condition And Expression Of Remorse Qualification Of '10+2 System' Cannot Be Equated With Other Certifications Absent An Equivalence Clause: Supreme Court Essential Qualifications In Recruitment Cannot Be Diluted Or Subject To Judicial Equivalence: Supreme Court Court Has Discretion To Decide Genuineness Of Signature By Comparison; Not Essential To Invoke Expert Opinion In All Cases: Supreme Court Civil Disputes Cannot Be Converted Into Criminal Offences To Recover Money: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 420 IPC Taxing Authorities Must Classify Goods Based On Form At Time Of Sale, Not End Use: Supreme Court Suit For Declaration Of Status Must Seek Consequential Relief To Avoid Bar Of Proviso: Allahabad High Court Illegal Detention | Police Failure To Maintain CCTV Footage Invokes Adverse Presumption Under Sec 119 BSA Against State: Allahabad High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Rebuts Presumption By Proving Intimation Of Misplaced Cheque To Bank And Lack Of Documentation For Alleged Settlement: Andhra Pradesh High Court Garnishee Proceedings Under CPC | Disputed Debt Cannot Be Summarily Adjudicated Without Leading Evidence: Bombay High Court Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022 | Magistrate’s Power Under Section 5 To Direct DNA Profiling Is Not Conditional Upon Consent: Calcutta High Court Conviction Based On 'Assumption And Presumption' Cannot Be Sustained: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Limitation Act | Suit For Specific Performance Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time Even If No Date For Performance Is Fixed: Delhi High Court Enrolment As Advocate | Bar Council Must Consider 'Equivalent Qualifications' Under Rule 4(a) Rules Of Legal Education: Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Pre-Arrest Bail Is Not A Matter Of Course; Must Show Special Case For Invoking Extraordinary Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Hindu Succession Act | A Co-parcener Cannot Alienate Entire Property; Non-Impleaded Legal Heir Not Bound By Previous Decree: Madras High Court Purchaser During Pendency Of Suit Bound By Compromise Decree, Cannot Treat It As Void In Collateral Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC | In Partition Suits, Defendants Asserting A Share Can Seek Transposition If Original Plaintiffs Withdraw: Patna High Court Section 69 BNS | Suppression Of Subsisting Marriage Or Live-In Relationship During Marriage Proposal Constitutes 'Deceitful Means': Kerala High Court Anticipatory Bail | Mere Apprehension Of Investigating Agency Is Insufficient To Deny Bail Without Demonstrating Necessity Of Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Income Tax Evasion | Criminal Prosecution Under Section 276C IT Act Cannot Sustain Once Foundation Assessment Order Is Set Aside: Punjab & Haryana High Court Election Petition Must Be Presented By Petitioner In Person, Non-Compliance Renders It Liable To Summary Dismissal: Supreme Court Absence Of Recovery Or Evidence Of Stolen Property Precludes Conviction Under Section 394 IPC: Supreme Court

Right to Education does not Entitle a Child to Admission in a Particular School of Choice: Delhi HC in Jiya’s Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment, has clarified that the right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, does not guarantee a child admission to a particular school of choice.

The Court held that the right to education entitles a child only to free and compulsory education till the age of fourteen and does not extend to securing admission in a specific school.

 

The case concerned Jiya, a child from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), who sought admission in Class II at Maharaja Agrasen Model School for the academic year 2023-24. She was denied admission in Class I in the previous year despite being shortlisted in a computerized draw by the Directorate of Education (DoE).

Eligibility for Admission under EWS Category: The Court noted that eligibility for admission under the EWS category requires application, shortlisting in a computerized draw, and allocation to a specific school for a specific academic year.

Direction to Admit in Specific School: The Court found that the DoE’s directive to admit Jiya in a specific school for the previous academic year was unenforceable as the right to admission does not carry forward automatically to subsequent years.

Role of DoE in Admission Process: The judgment underscored that the DoE’s role is subject to specific conditions and does not grant perpetual rights to admission in any subsequent academic year.

Decision of the Court:  The petition for Jiya’s admission to Class II in the specific school was rejected due to the absence of an application for that academic year. The Court, however, directed the DoE to secure Jiya’s admission in another school as an EWS student for Class II.

Date of Decision: March 22, 2024.

Jiya Through Her Next Friend and Natural Mother Ms. Sushma vs Maharaja Agrasen Model School & Anr.

Latest Legal News