CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Right to Education does not Entitle a Child to Admission in a Particular School of Choice: Delhi HC in Jiya’s Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment, has clarified that the right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, does not guarantee a child admission to a particular school of choice.

The Court held that the right to education entitles a child only to free and compulsory education till the age of fourteen and does not extend to securing admission in a specific school.

 

The case concerned Jiya, a child from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), who sought admission in Class II at Maharaja Agrasen Model School for the academic year 2023-24. She was denied admission in Class I in the previous year despite being shortlisted in a computerized draw by the Directorate of Education (DoE).

Eligibility for Admission under EWS Category: The Court noted that eligibility for admission under the EWS category requires application, shortlisting in a computerized draw, and allocation to a specific school for a specific academic year.

Direction to Admit in Specific School: The Court found that the DoE’s directive to admit Jiya in a specific school for the previous academic year was unenforceable as the right to admission does not carry forward automatically to subsequent years.

Role of DoE in Admission Process: The judgment underscored that the DoE’s role is subject to specific conditions and does not grant perpetual rights to admission in any subsequent academic year.

Decision of the Court:  The petition for Jiya’s admission to Class II in the specific school was rejected due to the absence of an application for that academic year. The Court, however, directed the DoE to secure Jiya’s admission in another school as an EWS student for Class II.

Date of Decision: March 22, 2024.

Jiya Through Her Next Friend and Natural Mother Ms. Sushma vs Maharaja Agrasen Model School & Anr.

Latest Legal News