Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court GST Act Does Not Prima Facie Prohibit Consolidated Show-Cause Notices For Multiple Years: Bombay HC Refers Issue To Larger Bench 90% Burn Injuries No Bar To Making Statement; Dying Declaration Can Be Sole Basis For Conviction If Found Truthful: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Right to Education does not Entitle a Child to Admission in a Particular School of Choice: Delhi HC in Jiya’s Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment, has clarified that the right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, does not guarantee a child admission to a particular school of choice.

The Court held that the right to education entitles a child only to free and compulsory education till the age of fourteen and does not extend to securing admission in a specific school.

 

The case concerned Jiya, a child from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), who sought admission in Class II at Maharaja Agrasen Model School for the academic year 2023-24. She was denied admission in Class I in the previous year despite being shortlisted in a computerized draw by the Directorate of Education (DoE).

Eligibility for Admission under EWS Category: The Court noted that eligibility for admission under the EWS category requires application, shortlisting in a computerized draw, and allocation to a specific school for a specific academic year.

Direction to Admit in Specific School: The Court found that the DoE’s directive to admit Jiya in a specific school for the previous academic year was unenforceable as the right to admission does not carry forward automatically to subsequent years.

Role of DoE in Admission Process: The judgment underscored that the DoE’s role is subject to specific conditions and does not grant perpetual rights to admission in any subsequent academic year.

Decision of the Court:  The petition for Jiya’s admission to Class II in the specific school was rejected due to the absence of an application for that academic year. The Court, however, directed the DoE to secure Jiya’s admission in another school as an EWS student for Class II.

Date of Decision: March 22, 2024.

Jiya Through Her Next Friend and Natural Mother Ms. Sushma vs Maharaja Agrasen Model School & Anr.

Latest Legal News