Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission

“Respondent’s Plea Smacked of Ulterior Motive”: Supreme Court Upholds Consent Terms in Land Acquisition Case

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on August 22nd, 2023, the court upheld the consent terms in a land acquisition case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the agreed terms between the parties. The judgment was delivered by J. [BELA M. TRIVEDI] and J. [DIPANKAR DATTA].

The case revolved around lands sought to be acquired by the respondent for the Agricultural Produce Market Committee under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act read with Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The parties had arrived at consent terms to determine the market value of the lands, and the appellant was to hand over possession and be paid the amount determined under the Award.

However, the respondent later raised the issue of limitation before the Reference Court, a move that the court found to be “not tenable and highly unreasonable and improper.” The judgment stated that the respondent’s plea “smacked of ulterior motive,” and the issue of limitation under Section 18 of the Act was made insignificant by the consent terms and High Court’s directions.

The court also emphasized the doctrine of harmonious construction, stating that the consent terms should be read as a whole, and any ambiguity should be interpreted in a manner consistent with other clauses and the intent of the parties.

In a decisive conclusion, the High Court’s judgments and orders were set aside as erroneous, and the appeals were allowed. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to consent terms and the principles of fair dealing in legal agreements, particularly in matters related to land acquisition.

Date of Decision: August 22nd, 2023

SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOL   TRUST & ORS.  vs THE CHAIRMAN & ANR.     

 

Latest Legal News