Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Rents Payable to A Creditor By A Debtor Are Considered Assignable Claims: Supreme Court

05 September 2024 5:44 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking legal ruling, the Supreme Court has confirmed that rents payable to a creditor by a debtor are considered "assignable claims." The verdict, delivered on October 19, 2023, settles a significant legal debate and has far-reaching implications for financial transactions involving debts and contractual rights.

The case in question, IL&FS vs. HDFC Bank, centered around the transfer of rents by IL&FS, a borrower, to HDFC Bank, the lender. The dispute arose when IL&FS argued that the transfer of rents was not a legitimate assignment but rather a pledge. The Supreme Court's judgment has unequivocally established that such transfers of debts are assignable claims under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The Court's observations during the judgment are instructive and emphasize the legality of the assignment. In the words of the Court, "An actionable claim would include a right to recover insurance money or a partner's right to sue for an account of a dissolved partnership or the right to claim the benefit of a contract not coupled with any liability."

Furthermore, the Court stressed, "The assignment of a debt will not be contrary to public policy solely on the grounds that the assignee has purchased the debt for a considerably discounted price or because that price is only payable after a period of credit. Nor will the assignment be contrary to public policy simply because the assignee may make a profit on the transaction at the end of the day."

This landmark judgment clarifies the distinction between pledges and assignments, solidifying the legal standing of debt assignments. It reinforces the practice of assigning debts and rights in financial transactions and has significant implications for creditors, debtors, and the financial industry as a whole.

The ruling reaffirms the principle that the substance of a transaction matters more than its form and that the nature and substance of the documents determine their legal implications. This decision is expected to have a profound impact on future financial agreements and will likely lead to greater clarity and certainty in such transactions.

Legal experts have hailed the judgment as a milestone in contract interpretation and property law, providing much-needed clarity on the assignment of claims and the transfer of debts. It is expected to guide future legal proceedings and set a precedent for similar cases, promoting transparency and efficiency in financial dealings.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

INFRASTRUCTURE LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.   vs HDFC BANK LTD. & ANR.

Similar News