Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Reliance Infrastructure wins arbitration dispute against State of Goa, High Court's verdict set aside

03 September 2024 10:17 AM

By: Admin


Reliance Infrastructure has emerged victorious in an arbitration dispute against the State of Goa over the delayed payment for the construction of a power plant. The Bombay High Court had reduced the interest rate awarded to Reliance by the arbitrator, but the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's verdict and restored the award in its entirety.

Reliance Infrastructure had constructed a 48 MW power plant for the State of Goa under a power purchase agreement (PPA). The project was commissioned in 2013, and Reliance sought arbitration in 2016 after the state failed to pay for the power generated by the plant. In 2018, the arbitrator awarded Reliance a sum of Rs. 292.22 crore along with an interest of 15% per annum from 1st August 2013 till the date of payment.

However, the State of Goa challenged the award in the Bombay High Court, which reduced the interest rate to 10% per annum. Reliance then filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the High Court's verdict.

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjay Kumar observed that the High Court had misdirected itself on the major issues concerning the merits of the award. The court noted that the arbitrator had acted within his jurisdiction in awarding the interest rate of 15% per annum, as prevailing interest rates at the time were in the range of 13% to 14% per annum.

The Supreme Court also held that the scope of "patent illegality" cannot be breached by mere use of different expressions which nevertheless refer only to "error" and not to "patent illegality". The court reprimanded the High Court for relying on the analysis of a learned Single Judge instead of examining the enunciations of the Supreme Court in earlier judgments.

The court set aside the High Court's verdict and restored the award in its entirety. The appeal filed by Reliance Infrastructure was allowed accordingly, and the appeal filed by the State of Goa was dismissed. The court ordered that no costs be awarded.

D.D-10.May.2023

RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.   vs STATE OF GOA 

Latest Legal News