Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Refused To Quash FIR: Continuity in Investigation but Prevents Arrest of Judicial Officers: Telangana High Court Directs

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Hyderabad, Oct 20, 2023 - In a significant decision, the Telangana High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, ruled that the investigation into a case involving multiple accused, including Judicial Officers, will continue. However, the court directed that the accused should not be arrested.

The case drew attention as both the complainant and one of the accused are Judicial Officers. Moreover, other accused also hold various positions in the judiciary or are family members related to the accused.

Justice Chakravarthy noted, "It is the specific contention of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners that petitioner No.5, is brother-in-law of accused No.1, is also a Judicial Officer, and he was undergoing training during the period of alleged incident. But, he was falsely implicated in the case."

The court made a critical observation about the delay in filing the complaint. "The contents of the complaint itself disclose that there is a delay of eight months in preferring the complaint. The second respondent is not a layman but a Judicial Officer and cannot take a lame excuse for the delay in filing the complaint," said Justice Chakravarthy.

The case involves allegations of dowry harassment and caste-based discrimination among other charges, drawing charges under the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act.

Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the state opposed the quashing of the FIR and contended that the complaint "is of six pages which has sufficient material to be investigated into."

The court concluded by stating, "This Court is of the considered view that the Investigating Officer shall continue the investigation and shall file an appropriate report before the concerned Court, but shall not arrest the petitioners herein."

With this order, the Telangana High Court has put a temporary halt to the arrest of the accused while allowing the investigation to proceed, emphasizing the necessity for due process and caution given the sensitive and high-profile nature of the case.

 Date of Decision: 20.10.2023

 Devarapalli Devendra Babu and Others vs The State Of Telangana and Others

         

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_October_2023-Devarapalli_Devendra_Babu_vs_The_State_Of_Telangana.pdf"]

Latest Legal News