TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Refused To Quash FIR: Continuity in Investigation but Prevents Arrest of Judicial Officers: Telangana High Court Directs

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Hyderabad, Oct 20, 2023 - In a significant decision, the Telangana High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, ruled that the investigation into a case involving multiple accused, including Judicial Officers, will continue. However, the court directed that the accused should not be arrested.

The case drew attention as both the complainant and one of the accused are Judicial Officers. Moreover, other accused also hold various positions in the judiciary or are family members related to the accused.

Justice Chakravarthy noted, "It is the specific contention of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners that petitioner No.5, is brother-in-law of accused No.1, is also a Judicial Officer, and he was undergoing training during the period of alleged incident. But, he was falsely implicated in the case."

The court made a critical observation about the delay in filing the complaint. "The contents of the complaint itself disclose that there is a delay of eight months in preferring the complaint. The second respondent is not a layman but a Judicial Officer and cannot take a lame excuse for the delay in filing the complaint," said Justice Chakravarthy.

The case involves allegations of dowry harassment and caste-based discrimination among other charges, drawing charges under the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act.

Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the state opposed the quashing of the FIR and contended that the complaint "is of six pages which has sufficient material to be investigated into."

The court concluded by stating, "This Court is of the considered view that the Investigating Officer shall continue the investigation and shall file an appropriate report before the concerned Court, but shall not arrest the petitioners herein."

With this order, the Telangana High Court has put a temporary halt to the arrest of the accused while allowing the investigation to proceed, emphasizing the necessity for due process and caution given the sensitive and high-profile nature of the case.

 Date of Decision: 20.10.2023

 Devarapalli Devendra Babu and Others vs The State Of Telangana and Others

         

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_October_2023-Devarapalli_Devendra_Babu_vs_The_State_Of_Telangana.pdf"]

Latest Legal News