Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Refused To Quash FIR: Continuity in Investigation but Prevents Arrest of Judicial Officers: Telangana High Court Directs

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Hyderabad, Oct 20, 2023 - In a significant decision, the Telangana High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, ruled that the investigation into a case involving multiple accused, including Judicial Officers, will continue. However, the court directed that the accused should not be arrested.

The case drew attention as both the complainant and one of the accused are Judicial Officers. Moreover, other accused also hold various positions in the judiciary or are family members related to the accused.

Justice Chakravarthy noted, "It is the specific contention of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners that petitioner No.5, is brother-in-law of accused No.1, is also a Judicial Officer, and he was undergoing training during the period of alleged incident. But, he was falsely implicated in the case."

The court made a critical observation about the delay in filing the complaint. "The contents of the complaint itself disclose that there is a delay of eight months in preferring the complaint. The second respondent is not a layman but a Judicial Officer and cannot take a lame excuse for the delay in filing the complaint," said Justice Chakravarthy.

The case involves allegations of dowry harassment and caste-based discrimination among other charges, drawing charges under the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act.

Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the state opposed the quashing of the FIR and contended that the complaint "is of six pages which has sufficient material to be investigated into."

The court concluded by stating, "This Court is of the considered view that the Investigating Officer shall continue the investigation and shall file an appropriate report before the concerned Court, but shall not arrest the petitioners herein."

With this order, the Telangana High Court has put a temporary halt to the arrest of the accused while allowing the investigation to proceed, emphasizing the necessity for due process and caution given the sensitive and high-profile nature of the case.

 Date of Decision: 20.10.2023

 Devarapalli Devendra Babu and Others vs The State Of Telangana and Others

         

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_October_2023-Devarapalli_Devendra_Babu_vs_The_State_Of_Telangana.pdf"]

Similar News