Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

RAILWAYS NOT LIABLE FOR PASSENGER'S STOLEN CASH: SUPREME COURT

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On June 15, 2023: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the Railways cannot be held responsible for the theft of a passenger's belongings. The judgment was delivered in the case of Station Superintendent & Anr. v. Surender Bhola (Civil Appeal No. 7116/2017). The Court stated, "We fail to understand as to how the theft could be said to be in any way a deficiency in service by the Railways. If the passenger is not able to protect his own belongings, the Railways cannot be held responsible."

Surender Bhola had raised a claim before the District Consumer Forum, seeking reimbursement of Rs. 1 lakh in cash that was stolen while he was travelling in a train. Bhola alleged that the cash, which was carried in a belt tied around his waist, was stolen, and therefore, the Railways should compensate him for the loss. The District Consumer Forum had awarded Rs. 1 lakh in favor of Bhola, a decision upheld by the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

However, the Supreme Court disagreed with the lower courts' decisions and overturned them, highlighting the passenger's responsibility to safeguard personal belongings. "If the passenger is unable to protect his own belongings, the Railways cannot be held responsible," the Court held. It further stated that the theft could not be considered a deficiency in service by the Railways.

The judgment, delivered by a Vacation Bench comprising of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, emphasized that the Railways cannot be held liable for the loss suffered by a passenger due to the passenger's own negligence or failure to protect their belongings.

The ruling clarifies the position of the Railways regarding the liability for theft of passenger belongings and sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. Passengers will now bear the responsibility of ensuring the safety of their personal belongings while traveling on trains.

Date of Judgment: June 15, 2023

STATION SUPERINTENDENT  & ANR.  vs SURENDER BHOLA     

Latest Legal News