MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

RAILWAYS NOT LIABLE FOR PASSENGER'S STOLEN CASH: SUPREME COURT

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On June 15, 2023: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the Railways cannot be held responsible for the theft of a passenger's belongings. The judgment was delivered in the case of Station Superintendent & Anr. v. Surender Bhola (Civil Appeal No. 7116/2017). The Court stated, "We fail to understand as to how the theft could be said to be in any way a deficiency in service by the Railways. If the passenger is not able to protect his own belongings, the Railways cannot be held responsible."

Surender Bhola had raised a claim before the District Consumer Forum, seeking reimbursement of Rs. 1 lakh in cash that was stolen while he was travelling in a train. Bhola alleged that the cash, which was carried in a belt tied around his waist, was stolen, and therefore, the Railways should compensate him for the loss. The District Consumer Forum had awarded Rs. 1 lakh in favor of Bhola, a decision upheld by the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

However, the Supreme Court disagreed with the lower courts' decisions and overturned them, highlighting the passenger's responsibility to safeguard personal belongings. "If the passenger is unable to protect his own belongings, the Railways cannot be held responsible," the Court held. It further stated that the theft could not be considered a deficiency in service by the Railways.

The judgment, delivered by a Vacation Bench comprising of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, emphasized that the Railways cannot be held liable for the loss suffered by a passenger due to the passenger's own negligence or failure to protect their belongings.

The ruling clarifies the position of the Railways regarding the liability for theft of passenger belongings and sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. Passengers will now bear the responsibility of ensuring the safety of their personal belongings while traveling on trains.

Date of Judgment: June 15, 2023

STATION SUPERINTENDENT  & ANR.  vs SURENDER BHOLA     

Latest Legal News