Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

"Punjab-Haryana High Court Upholds the Principle 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' in Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Lovepreet Singh @ Love, in a case involving allegations of robbery and arms possession. The decision, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, emphatically reinforced the foundational principle of criminal jurisprudence, stating "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception".

Lovepreet Singh had been in custody since May 24, 2022, following allegations of snatching gold ornaments at gunpoint, as per FIR No. 49 dated April 29, 2022. The case, registered under Sections 379-B(2), 34, and 201 of the IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural, had seen little progress, with charges being framed as late as August 8, 2023, and none of the 17 prosecution witnesses having been examined to date.

In his ruling, Justice Tiwari cited the landmark judgment "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay" (1977), which established the principle that detention should only be used to ensure an accused's availability for trial. The court observed that if an accused's presence can be secured otherwise, then continued detention is not mandatory.

The court's decision was also influenced by the fact that co-accused in the case had already been granted bail. This, coupled with the prolonged detention of Lovepreet Singh and the stalled trial process, formed the basis for granting bail.

In his concluding remarks, Justice Tiwari stated, "The grant of bail in this case is consistent with the sanctity of individual liberty and the presumption of innocence, which are cornerstones of our legal system." He further clarified that this decision should not be seen as a comment on the merits of the case but rather as a necessary step in ensuring justice and fair trial rights.

The decision has been received positively by legal experts, who view it as a reaffirmation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly in relation to personal liberty and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Lovepreet Singh is expected to be released on bail upon furnishing the required bail and surety bonds, as directed by the court. The case will continue to be tried on its merits, with the court's observations in the bail decision having no bearing on the outcome of the trial.

Date of Decision: 22nd December 2023 

Lovepreet Singh @ Love Vs  State Of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News