UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

"Punjab-Haryana High Court Upholds the Principle 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' in Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Lovepreet Singh @ Love, in a case involving allegations of robbery and arms possession. The decision, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, emphatically reinforced the foundational principle of criminal jurisprudence, stating "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception".

Lovepreet Singh had been in custody since May 24, 2022, following allegations of snatching gold ornaments at gunpoint, as per FIR No. 49 dated April 29, 2022. The case, registered under Sections 379-B(2), 34, and 201 of the IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural, had seen little progress, with charges being framed as late as August 8, 2023, and none of the 17 prosecution witnesses having been examined to date.

In his ruling, Justice Tiwari cited the landmark judgment "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay" (1977), which established the principle that detention should only be used to ensure an accused's availability for trial. The court observed that if an accused's presence can be secured otherwise, then continued detention is not mandatory.

The court's decision was also influenced by the fact that co-accused in the case had already been granted bail. This, coupled with the prolonged detention of Lovepreet Singh and the stalled trial process, formed the basis for granting bail.

In his concluding remarks, Justice Tiwari stated, "The grant of bail in this case is consistent with the sanctity of individual liberty and the presumption of innocence, which are cornerstones of our legal system." He further clarified that this decision should not be seen as a comment on the merits of the case but rather as a necessary step in ensuring justice and fair trial rights.

The decision has been received positively by legal experts, who view it as a reaffirmation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly in relation to personal liberty and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Lovepreet Singh is expected to be released on bail upon furnishing the required bail and surety bonds, as directed by the court. The case will continue to be tried on its merits, with the court's observations in the bail decision having no bearing on the outcome of the trial.

Date of Decision: 22nd December 2023 

Lovepreet Singh @ Love Vs  State Of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News