Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

"Punjab-Haryana High Court Upholds the Principle 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' in Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Lovepreet Singh @ Love, in a case involving allegations of robbery and arms possession. The decision, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, emphatically reinforced the foundational principle of criminal jurisprudence, stating "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception".

Lovepreet Singh had been in custody since May 24, 2022, following allegations of snatching gold ornaments at gunpoint, as per FIR No. 49 dated April 29, 2022. The case, registered under Sections 379-B(2), 34, and 201 of the IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural, had seen little progress, with charges being framed as late as August 8, 2023, and none of the 17 prosecution witnesses having been examined to date.

In his ruling, Justice Tiwari cited the landmark judgment "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay" (1977), which established the principle that detention should only be used to ensure an accused's availability for trial. The court observed that if an accused's presence can be secured otherwise, then continued detention is not mandatory.

The court's decision was also influenced by the fact that co-accused in the case had already been granted bail. This, coupled with the prolonged detention of Lovepreet Singh and the stalled trial process, formed the basis for granting bail.

In his concluding remarks, Justice Tiwari stated, "The grant of bail in this case is consistent with the sanctity of individual liberty and the presumption of innocence, which are cornerstones of our legal system." He further clarified that this decision should not be seen as a comment on the merits of the case but rather as a necessary step in ensuring justice and fair trial rights.

The decision has been received positively by legal experts, who view it as a reaffirmation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly in relation to personal liberty and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Lovepreet Singh is expected to be released on bail upon furnishing the required bail and surety bonds, as directed by the court. The case will continue to be tried on its merits, with the court's observations in the bail decision having no bearing on the outcome of the trial.

Date of Decision: 22nd December 2023 

Lovepreet Singh @ Love Vs  State Of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News