Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Expedited Compensation for Electrocution Victims as per PSPCL Policy: "Apply Policy to Pending Cases, Subject to Proving Negligence"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj, has directed the Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (PSPCL) to efficiently process and disburse compensation claims for victims of electrocution. This order pertains to multiple petitions seeking redress for fatal and non-fatal injuries sustained due to electrocution.

The judgment, dated December 15, 2023, encompasses a wide array of petitions, ranging from CWP-11626-2023 to CWP-27831-2023. These petitions involve regular and contractual employees of the Electricity Department and private individuals who have suffered due to electrocution.

Justice Bhardwaj observed, "The PSPCL's policy, detailed under Office Order No.10, I.R.O. 676, Dated 08.12.2023, must be applied to all pending cases, subject to determination of the negligence of the Authority concerned." This statement underscores the court's emphasis on the necessity of a systematic approach to compensation in cases of electrocution.

The policy outlined by PSPCL includes specific provisions for different categories of victims – regular employees, contractual workers, and private individuals (both adults and minors). The compensation structure is aligned with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

In his detailed order, Justice Bhardwaj included an illustrative table demonstrating the calculation of compensation amounts under various scenarios. This move is seen as an effort to bring clarity and transparency to the compensation process.

The court directed the petitions to be disposed of with instructions for the petitioners to approach PSPCL with their compensation claims, as per the policy. Additionally, the PSPCL and other respondent authorities have been instructed to consider and decide upon these claims expeditiously and within the time frame stipulated in the policy.

 

Date of Decision: 15 August 2023

PARAMJEET SINGH VS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. 

Latest Legal News