Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Expedited Compensation for Electrocution Victims as per PSPCL Policy: "Apply Policy to Pending Cases, Subject to Proving Negligence"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj, has directed the Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (PSPCL) to efficiently process and disburse compensation claims for victims of electrocution. This order pertains to multiple petitions seeking redress for fatal and non-fatal injuries sustained due to electrocution.

The judgment, dated December 15, 2023, encompasses a wide array of petitions, ranging from CWP-11626-2023 to CWP-27831-2023. These petitions involve regular and contractual employees of the Electricity Department and private individuals who have suffered due to electrocution.

Justice Bhardwaj observed, "The PSPCL's policy, detailed under Office Order No.10, I.R.O. 676, Dated 08.12.2023, must be applied to all pending cases, subject to determination of the negligence of the Authority concerned." This statement underscores the court's emphasis on the necessity of a systematic approach to compensation in cases of electrocution.

The policy outlined by PSPCL includes specific provisions for different categories of victims – regular employees, contractual workers, and private individuals (both adults and minors). The compensation structure is aligned with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

In his detailed order, Justice Bhardwaj included an illustrative table demonstrating the calculation of compensation amounts under various scenarios. This move is seen as an effort to bring clarity and transparency to the compensation process.

The court directed the petitions to be disposed of with instructions for the petitioners to approach PSPCL with their compensation claims, as per the policy. Additionally, the PSPCL and other respondent authorities have been instructed to consider and decide upon these claims expeditiously and within the time frame stipulated in the policy.

 

Date of Decision: 15 August 2023

PARAMJEET SINGH VS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. 

Similar News