Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Expedited Compensation for Electrocution Victims as per PSPCL Policy: "Apply Policy to Pending Cases, Subject to Proving Negligence"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj, has directed the Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (PSPCL) to efficiently process and disburse compensation claims for victims of electrocution. This order pertains to multiple petitions seeking redress for fatal and non-fatal injuries sustained due to electrocution.

The judgment, dated December 15, 2023, encompasses a wide array of petitions, ranging from CWP-11626-2023 to CWP-27831-2023. These petitions involve regular and contractual employees of the Electricity Department and private individuals who have suffered due to electrocution.

Justice Bhardwaj observed, "The PSPCL's policy, detailed under Office Order No.10, I.R.O. 676, Dated 08.12.2023, must be applied to all pending cases, subject to determination of the negligence of the Authority concerned." This statement underscores the court's emphasis on the necessity of a systematic approach to compensation in cases of electrocution.

The policy outlined by PSPCL includes specific provisions for different categories of victims – regular employees, contractual workers, and private individuals (both adults and minors). The compensation structure is aligned with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

In his detailed order, Justice Bhardwaj included an illustrative table demonstrating the calculation of compensation amounts under various scenarios. This move is seen as an effort to bring clarity and transparency to the compensation process.

The court directed the petitions to be disposed of with instructions for the petitioners to approach PSPCL with their compensation claims, as per the policy. Additionally, the PSPCL and other respondent authorities have been instructed to consider and decide upon these claims expeditiously and within the time frame stipulated in the policy.

 

Date of Decision: 15 August 2023

PARAMJEET SINGH VS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. 

Similar News