Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Transfer of Trial, Treating Juvenile as Adult in Heinous Offense Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, May 3, 2023: In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has upheld the transfer of trial and treated a juvenile in a heinous offense case as an adult. The decision came in a Criminal Revision Petition (CRR-452-2023) filed by the juvenile, Bholu, who was in conflict with the law, against the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The case pertained to an incident that occurred on September 8, 2017, in Gurugram, where the juvenile was charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Arms Act, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act).

The High Court, after careful consideration of the previous orders and appeals, including those made before the Supreme Court, found that the Juvenile Justice Board had followed the directions of the apex court and conducted a detailed assessment of the mental and physical capacity of the juvenile. The Board concluded that the juvenile possessed the necessary capacity to understand the consequences of the offense and transferred the trial to the Children's Court under Section 18(3) of the JJ Act.

The Court further observed that the Board had strictly adhered to the Supreme Court's directions and found no illegality in its decision. The detailed assessment included factors such as mental age, intelligence functioning, clinical assessment, social investigation report, and family circumstances. The Court also took note of the absence of evidence regarding parental neglect, abuse, or substance abuse by the juvenile.

03.05.2023

Bholu, a ‘Juvinile in conflict with law’ vs Central Bureau of Inves ga on

Latest Legal News