Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Proceedings in COVID-19 Lockdown Violation Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed a stay on further proceedings in cases registered under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, provided other provisions of the IPC or other penal enactments are not invoked.

The Court observed the inundation of the judicial system with a large number of cases under Section 188 IPC in conjunction with the Epidemic Diseases Act and the Disaster Management Act, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The States of Punjab, Haryana, and Union Territory of Chandigarh reported thousands of such pending cases. The Court, while hearing a suo motu case, considered the need for across-the-board action to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and the accused.

Acknowledging the unprecedented challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court noted the nationwide lockdown and the resultant legal actions against violators. “People were, by and large, obeying these orders but there could be emergent situations that may have compelled them to venture out,” the Court observed, indicating a nuanced understanding of the circumstances. In an interim measure, the Court exercised its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay further proceedings in specified cases.

The Court’s decision revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 188 IPC in the context of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, particularly in light of the extraordinary situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The invocation of Article 226 signifies the Court’s constitutional authority to issue necessary directions in matters of public interest and justice.

The Court ordered the stay of further proceedings in the cases falling under the specified sections until the next date of hearing, set for March 14, 2024. This decision marks a temporary relief for individuals accused under these specific legal provisions during the pandemic lockdown.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News