Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Proceedings in COVID-19 Lockdown Violation Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed a stay on further proceedings in cases registered under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, provided other provisions of the IPC or other penal enactments are not invoked.

The Court observed the inundation of the judicial system with a large number of cases under Section 188 IPC in conjunction with the Epidemic Diseases Act and the Disaster Management Act, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The States of Punjab, Haryana, and Union Territory of Chandigarh reported thousands of such pending cases. The Court, while hearing a suo motu case, considered the need for across-the-board action to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and the accused.

Acknowledging the unprecedented challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court noted the nationwide lockdown and the resultant legal actions against violators. “People were, by and large, obeying these orders but there could be emergent situations that may have compelled them to venture out,” the Court observed, indicating a nuanced understanding of the circumstances. In an interim measure, the Court exercised its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay further proceedings in specified cases.

The Court’s decision revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 188 IPC in the context of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, particularly in light of the extraordinary situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The invocation of Article 226 signifies the Court’s constitutional authority to issue necessary directions in matters of public interest and justice.

The Court ordered the stay of further proceedings in the cases falling under the specified sections until the next date of hearing, set for March 14, 2024. This decision marks a temporary relief for individuals accused under these specific legal provisions during the pandemic lockdown.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News