Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Proceedings in COVID-19 Lockdown Violation Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed a stay on further proceedings in cases registered under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, provided other provisions of the IPC or other penal enactments are not invoked.

The Court observed the inundation of the judicial system with a large number of cases under Section 188 IPC in conjunction with the Epidemic Diseases Act and the Disaster Management Act, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The States of Punjab, Haryana, and Union Territory of Chandigarh reported thousands of such pending cases. The Court, while hearing a suo motu case, considered the need for across-the-board action to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and the accused.

Acknowledging the unprecedented challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court noted the nationwide lockdown and the resultant legal actions against violators. “People were, by and large, obeying these orders but there could be emergent situations that may have compelled them to venture out,” the Court observed, indicating a nuanced understanding of the circumstances. In an interim measure, the Court exercised its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay further proceedings in specified cases.

The Court’s decision revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 188 IPC in the context of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, particularly in light of the extraordinary situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The invocation of Article 226 signifies the Court’s constitutional authority to issue necessary directions in matters of public interest and justice.

The Court ordered the stay of further proceedings in the cases falling under the specified sections until the next date of hearing, set for March 14, 2024. This decision marks a temporary relief for individuals accused under these specific legal provisions during the pandemic lockdown.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News