Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Proceedings in COVID-19 Lockdown Violation Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed a stay on further proceedings in cases registered under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, provided other provisions of the IPC or other penal enactments are not invoked.

The Court observed the inundation of the judicial system with a large number of cases under Section 188 IPC in conjunction with the Epidemic Diseases Act and the Disaster Management Act, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The States of Punjab, Haryana, and Union Territory of Chandigarh reported thousands of such pending cases. The Court, while hearing a suo motu case, considered the need for across-the-board action to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and the accused.

Acknowledging the unprecedented challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court noted the nationwide lockdown and the resultant legal actions against violators. “People were, by and large, obeying these orders but there could be emergent situations that may have compelled them to venture out,” the Court observed, indicating a nuanced understanding of the circumstances. In an interim measure, the Court exercised its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay further proceedings in specified cases.

The Court’s decision revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 188 IPC in the context of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, particularly in light of the extraordinary situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The invocation of Article 226 signifies the Court’s constitutional authority to issue necessary directions in matters of public interest and justice.

The Court ordered the stay of further proceedings in the cases falling under the specified sections until the next date of hearing, set for March 14, 2024. This decision marks a temporary relief for individuals accused under these specific legal provisions during the pandemic lockdown.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News