UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Proceedings in COVID-19 Lockdown Violation Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed a stay on further proceedings in cases registered under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, provided other provisions of the IPC or other penal enactments are not invoked.

The Court observed the inundation of the judicial system with a large number of cases under Section 188 IPC in conjunction with the Epidemic Diseases Act and the Disaster Management Act, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The States of Punjab, Haryana, and Union Territory of Chandigarh reported thousands of such pending cases. The Court, while hearing a suo motu case, considered the need for across-the-board action to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and the accused.

Acknowledging the unprecedented challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court noted the nationwide lockdown and the resultant legal actions against violators. “People were, by and large, obeying these orders but there could be emergent situations that may have compelled them to venture out,” the Court observed, indicating a nuanced understanding of the circumstances. In an interim measure, the Court exercised its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay further proceedings in specified cases.

The Court’s decision revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 188 IPC in the context of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, particularly in light of the extraordinary situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The invocation of Article 226 signifies the Court’s constitutional authority to issue necessary directions in matters of public interest and justice.

The Court ordered the stay of further proceedings in the cases falling under the specified sections until the next date of hearing, set for March 14, 2024. This decision marks a temporary relief for individuals accused under these specific legal provisions during the pandemic lockdown.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News