Knife Never Found, Depth of Wounds Unknown: Delhi HC Refuses To Upgrade Stabbing Conviction From Grievous Hurt To Attempt To Murder 'AL KAMDHENU GOLD' Belongs To Kamdhenu, Not Ashiana: Delhi HC Finds 2002 Agreement Was A Licence, Not An Assignment — Grants Injunction Against Steel Rival Land Acquired In 2004 At ₹19,660/sq.m — Company Can Now Claim ₹1,30,000/sq.m After Neighbour's Plot Gets That Rate: Delhi HC Allows Amendment After 16 Years State Used Eminent Domain to Hand Over 53 Acres to a Non-Existent Company: Karnataka High Court Quashes Acquisition, Orders CBI Investigation Trademark | Passing Off Action Requires Only Likelihood Of Confusion, Not Strict Proof Of Counterfeiting: Madras High Court Buyer Failing To Pay Full Amount On Time Cannot Sustain Cheating Case If Seller Transfers Property To Third Party: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Arbitrarily Deviate From Merit-Based Posting SOP For Senior Resident Doctors: Calcutta High Court Ready Reckoner Rates Cannot Form Sole Basis For Determining Land Acquisition Compensation: Bombay High Court MACT Cannot Decide Personal Accident Claims of Vehicle Owners: Madras High Court Sets Aside Rs. 15 Lakh Award Specific Performance | Sale Agreement to Cheat Stamp Duty Is Void, But Buyer Still Gets Money Back: Madras High Court Higher Degree Cannot Substitute Essential Work Experience; Preference Operates Only Among Eligible Candidates: Supreme Court Legal Representatives Aggrieved By Arbitral Award Must Challenge It Under Section 34 Arbitration Act, Not Article 227: Supreme Court Advocates Can’t Use Press Conferences To Scandalise Judges; Grievances Must Be Ventilated Through Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Property Register Entry Not Proof Of Ownership: Supreme Court Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Put To Trial By Litigants: Delhi High Court Dismisses Recusal Pleas Of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia & Others

Punjab and Haryana High Court Remands Ownership Dispute over Shamlat Deh to Lower Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently remanded an ownership dispute over Shamlat Deh land to the lower court, after additional evidence emerged regarding the sale of the land through a sale certificate made in favour of the petitioners.

In the case of Nishan Singh (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others, the Gram Panchayat Raipur Gujjran had instituted a case under Section 11 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 seeking a declaratory decree for ownership of the land. The lower court had granted the declaratory relief to the petitioner, after the sale certificate was not tendered into evidence nor was it proven in accordance with law.

However, the petitioner later obtained information through an application under the Right to Information Act, 2006 that the suit land was indeed sold through a sale certificate made in their favour. This additional evidence emerged only before the High Court and was not tendered or proven in accordance with law before the lower court.

The High Court assigned only prima facie credence to the annexure, and as a result, quashed the impugned verdicts made against the petitioners. The court remanded the case to the learned Collector concerned, with a direction to restore the case to its original number, permit the petitioners to tender the additional evidence before the court, ensure that it is proven in accordance with law and grant an opportunity to adduce rebuttable evidence to the Gram Panchayat concerned. The court directed the Remand back to Court to decide the case afresh but positively within three months from the date of the order.

Nishan Singh (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs State of Punjab and Others      

Latest Legal News