Supreme Court Strikes Down Expulsion of Bihar MLC as Disproportionate, Orders Immediate Reinstatement Private Banks Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Allegation of Forgery is Not Enough: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute When a Case is Made Out for Bail, Courts Should Not Hesitate: Kerala High Court Allows Bail Despite Commercial Quantity of Drugs Seized Retailers Cannot Be Prosecuted for Manufacturer’s Fault" – Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Pesticide Dealers Mere Issuance of a Cheque Does Not Prove Legally Enforceable Debt": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonor Case Courts Cannot Ignore Urgent Repairs When Public Safety is at Stake: Calcutta High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Bombay High Court Rejects Premature Dismissal of Partition Suit No Substantial Question of Law – High Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Injunction Cannot Be Granted Without Proof of Possession: Allahabad High Court Quashes Relief in Land Dispute Section 197 CrPC | Sanction for Prosecution is a Shield, Not a Sword: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against BIS Officer Landlord is the Best Judge of His Needs: Supreme Court Orders Eviction in Favor of Landowner Vijaya Bank TT Scam | Supreme Court Acquits Jeweller in ₹6.7 Crore Vijaya Bank Fraud Case, Orders Return of 205 Gold Bars Procurement Preference for Small Enterprises is a Legal Mandate, Not a Mere Policy: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of MSMEs Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Against Interlocutory Orders of Commercial Courts: Orissa High Court Declares Section 8 Bar Absolute Victim’s Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality to Be Sole Basis of Conviction: Kerala High Court Reduces Sentence of Pastor Convicted for Repeated Rape of Minor Providing Set-Top Boxes to Subscribers Constitutes Sale”: Karnataka High Court Upholds VAT on Tata Play Limited Mere Registration of FIR Cannot Justify Denial of Passport Renewal: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Remands Ownership Dispute over Shamlat Deh to Lower Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently remanded an ownership dispute over Shamlat Deh land to the lower court, after additional evidence emerged regarding the sale of the land through a sale certificate made in favour of the petitioners.

In the case of Nishan Singh (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others, the Gram Panchayat Raipur Gujjran had instituted a case under Section 11 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 seeking a declaratory decree for ownership of the land. The lower court had granted the declaratory relief to the petitioner, after the sale certificate was not tendered into evidence nor was it proven in accordance with law.

However, the petitioner later obtained information through an application under the Right to Information Act, 2006 that the suit land was indeed sold through a sale certificate made in their favour. This additional evidence emerged only before the High Court and was not tendered or proven in accordance with law before the lower court.

The High Court assigned only prima facie credence to the annexure, and as a result, quashed the impugned verdicts made against the petitioners. The court remanded the case to the learned Collector concerned, with a direction to restore the case to its original number, permit the petitioners to tender the additional evidence before the court, ensure that it is proven in accordance with law and grant an opportunity to adduce rebuttable evidence to the Gram Panchayat concerned. The court directed the Remand back to Court to decide the case afresh but positively within three months from the date of the order.

Nishan Singh (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs State of Punjab and Others      

Similar News