Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes FIR - Lack of Cheating Allegations and Valid Licenses

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed an FIR filed against Bhupinder Singh and others, stating that the allegations of cheating were not present and the accused firms held valid licenses. The decision was made by Justice Gurbir Singh on July 4, 2023.

The FIR, registered under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, accused the firms of violating various provisions related to insecticides and fertilizers. However, the court found that there were no allegations of cheating made against the accused.

The petitioners' counsel argued that the accused firms possessed valid licenses for selling and stocking insecticides. Furthermore, the samples taken from the premises were found to be in compliance with the specified standards. The defense also contended that the allegations fell under a special legislation and required prior sanction, which was not obtained.

Justice Gurbir Singh, in the judgment, stated, "There is no allegation made by any farmer and there is no complaint from any corner that any cheating was committed, so provisions of Sections 420, 120-B IPC are not attracted at all." The court also relied on previous judgments, including Pardeep Kumar Garg and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Ors., Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana, Padam Bansal vs. State of Haryana, Piyara Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, and Yadwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and Ors.

Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioners. However, it clarified that the order would not prevent any further proceedings if initiated through the due process of law.

This judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court highlights the importance of establishing valid allegations and compliance with the relevant laws in criminal proceedings, ensuring a fair and just legal process for all parties involved.

Date of Decision: 04.07.2023

Bhupinder Singh & Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anr. 

Latest Legal News