Deputy Registrar Of Chits Competent To Act As Arbitrator And Issue Recovery Certificates; Not Limited To Registrar Alone: Telangana High Court Custody With Biological Mother Presumed Lawful; Writ Of Habeas Corpus Not A Remedy To Enforce Foreign Court’s Return Orders: Bombay High Court Ocular Testimony Of Victim Prevails Over Medical Evidence In Rape Cases If Found Credible: Allahabad High Court Condonation Of Delay Should Follow Justice-Oriented Liberal Approach, Unintentional Delay Shouldn't Block Justice: Calcutta High Court Digital Banking Fraud: Clicking Suspicious Links Constitutes Customer Negligence; Liability Cannot Be Fastened On Bank Without Forensic Evidence: Delhi High Court Vexatious Matrimonial Complaints Filed As Counterblast To Divorce Is Abuse Of Process; Allegations Against In-Laws Must Be Specific: Gujarat High Court Sale Deed Executed By Son During Father's Lifetime Based On Manipulated Records Is Void Ab Initio: Karnataka High Court Charge Sheet E-Filed After Court Hours Deemed Filed Next Day; Accused Entitled To Default Bail: Kerala High Court Landowners Can't Use Antedated Stamp Papers To Defeat Ceiling Limits; Section 22 Land Reforms Act Prevails Over Registration Act: Madras High Court Rajasthan High Court Orders Tehsildar To Personally Pay ₹2 Lakh Compensation For 53-Day Illegal Detention Despite Suspension Of Sentence Mere Existence Of Dargah Doesn't Grant Jurisdiction To Waqf Board; Statutory Survey Under Sections 4 & 5 Is Mandatory: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Sets Aside Interim Stay On Delhi Race Club Eviction; Says Courts Can't Halt Statutory Proceedings Without Recording Finding On Prima Facie Case

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes FIR - Lack of Cheating Allegations and Valid Licenses

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed an FIR filed against Bhupinder Singh and others, stating that the allegations of cheating were not present and the accused firms held valid licenses. The decision was made by Justice Gurbir Singh on July 4, 2023.

The FIR, registered under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, accused the firms of violating various provisions related to insecticides and fertilizers. However, the court found that there were no allegations of cheating made against the accused.

The petitioners' counsel argued that the accused firms possessed valid licenses for selling and stocking insecticides. Furthermore, the samples taken from the premises were found to be in compliance with the specified standards. The defense also contended that the allegations fell under a special legislation and required prior sanction, which was not obtained.

Justice Gurbir Singh, in the judgment, stated, "There is no allegation made by any farmer and there is no complaint from any corner that any cheating was committed, so provisions of Sections 420, 120-B IPC are not attracted at all." The court also relied on previous judgments, including Pardeep Kumar Garg and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Ors., Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana, Padam Bansal vs. State of Haryana, Piyara Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, and Yadwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and Ors.

Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioners. However, it clarified that the order would not prevent any further proceedings if initiated through the due process of law.

This judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court highlights the importance of establishing valid allegations and compliance with the relevant laws in criminal proceedings, ensuring a fair and just legal process for all parties involved.

Date of Decision: 04.07.2023

Bhupinder Singh & Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anr. 

Latest Legal News