Release of Co-Sureties’ Properties Bars Revival in Debt Recovery Proceedings: Karnataka High Court Rajasthan High Court Permits Summoning of Tower Location Records of Police Officials in Corruption Case ISF's Public Meeting | Freedom of Speech and Assembly Is Fundamental but Subject to Reasonable Restrictions: Calcutta High Court Single Blow Aimed at a Vital Part With Dangerous Weapon Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC: Kerala High Court Orissa High Court Quashes FIR Against Law Students Over Ragging Incident Pre-Trial Detention Cannot Be Punitive; Bail is the Rule, Jail the Exception: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused in ₹3.06 Crore Forgery Case Collector's Actions in No Confidence Motion Held Illegal; Cost Imposed on State for Abdication of Statutory Duties: Allahabad High Court Judiciary as Guardian of the Constitution Must Address Failures in Law Enforcement: P&H High Court Demands Action Plan on 79,000 FIRs Pending Beyond Statutory Period NDPS | Presence of Contraband in Taxi Alone Is Not Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Auction Purchaser’s Title Cannot Be Defeated by Unregistered Documents or Unsubstantiated Claims: Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order Land Acquisition | Section 28A Application Maintainable Based on Appellate Court’s Enhanced Compensation: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Using Article 142: ₹25 Lakh Settlement Ends All Pending Cases Common Intention Requires No Prior Planning; May Arise During the Incident: Supreme Court TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTRIX MUST "INSPIRE CONFIDENCE": SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS ACQUITTAL IN RAPE CASE

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes FIR - Lack of Cheating Allegations and Valid Licenses

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed an FIR filed against Bhupinder Singh and others, stating that the allegations of cheating were not present and the accused firms held valid licenses. The decision was made by Justice Gurbir Singh on July 4, 2023.

The FIR, registered under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, accused the firms of violating various provisions related to insecticides and fertilizers. However, the court found that there were no allegations of cheating made against the accused.

The petitioners' counsel argued that the accused firms possessed valid licenses for selling and stocking insecticides. Furthermore, the samples taken from the premises were found to be in compliance with the specified standards. The defense also contended that the allegations fell under a special legislation and required prior sanction, which was not obtained.

Justice Gurbir Singh, in the judgment, stated, "There is no allegation made by any farmer and there is no complaint from any corner that any cheating was committed, so provisions of Sections 420, 120-B IPC are not attracted at all." The court also relied on previous judgments, including Pardeep Kumar Garg and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Ors., Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana, Padam Bansal vs. State of Haryana, Piyara Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, and Yadwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and Ors.

Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioners. However, it clarified that the order would not prevent any further proceedings if initiated through the due process of law.

This judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court highlights the importance of establishing valid allegations and compliance with the relevant laws in criminal proceedings, ensuring a fair and just legal process for all parties involved.

Date of Decision: 04.07.2023

Bhupinder Singh & Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anr. 

Similar News