Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Dismissal Order, Citing Violation of Natural Justice

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a dismissal order issued against Sheetal Sharma, citing a violation of natural justice. Justice Pankaj Jain, while delivering the judgment, stated, "The extreme punishment of dismissal awarded to a delinquent cannot be viewed lightly," emphasizing the importance of conducting a proper inquiry before imposing such a severe penalty. The court further highlighted the need for adherence to the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.

The case pertained to Sheetal Sharma, who served as a Junior Assistant with respondent No. 3. She was booked in an FIR under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar Mohali, resulting in her arrest and subsequent judicial custody. Despite her custodial status, the department proceeded with an inquiry against her, which she argued was conducted without her knowledge or opportunity to defend herself effectively.

Justice Jain observed that the State, as the petitioner's employer, should have been more considerate and pragmatic in handling the matter. "The State ought to have waited at least until the petitioner was bailed out from judicial custody," remarked the judge. The court further pointed out that the petitioner had not been convicted in the criminal case, and until proven guilty, she could not be deemed a convict.

Highlighting the violation of natural justice, Justice Jain noted that the inquiry officer's report and related documents were not supplied to the petitioner, contrary to the requirements of Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The court cited previous judgments, including Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad v. B. Karunahar (1993) 4 SCC 727, which stressed the importance of providing the accused with a fair and reasonable opportunity to defend themselves.

High Court set aside the dismissal order and subsequent order passed against Sheetal Sharma. The court granted the respondents the liberty to pass a fresh order in accordance with the law. This ruling emphasizes the significance of upholding principles of natural justice and ensuring a fair and just inquiry process in disciplinary proceedings.

Date of Decision: 31st May 2023

Sheetal Sharma @ Kanwaljeet Kaur VS State of Punjab and ors. 

Latest Legal News