Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’

Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues Order to Ensure Unobstructed Flow of Traffic on National Highway-44

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 6, 2023

In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a crucial order to maintain the smooth movement of traffic on National Highway-44 (NH-44). The court's directive comes in response to an application filed by petitioner Randeep Tanwar in the case of CM-37-CWP-PIL-2023, challenging the gathering of a mob on the highway.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, sought the court's intervention to prevent a potential disruption caused by the mob gathering, which was allegedly in violation of the court's previous interim directions issued on September 23, 2022.

During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel presented an affidavit from the Chief Secretary of the Government of Haryana, which stated that talks were held with the leaders of Bhartiya Kisan Union (Union), the sixth respondent in the case. As a result of these discussions, the Union had agreed to remove the road blockade on NH-44, provided that the agricultural produce in the mandis (marketplaces) was protected from the rain.

However, the petitioner's counsel argued that the Union had once again threatened to resume the blockade if the purchase of Surajmukhi crop produce was not initiated promptly. He played video recordings from news channels in court, highlighting the Union leaders' demands to divert traffic from NH-44 as they prepared to block it again.

Considering the seriousness of the situation, the court, led by Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul and Justice Manisha Batra, deemed it appropriate to issue directions to the official respondents. The court ordered the officials to ensure the unobstructed flow of traffic on NH-44, emphasizing that the highway serves as a crucial lifeline connecting various parts of the country.

While issuing the directive, the court also cautioned the administration to exercise utmost restraint and resort to force only as a last resort in dispersing the gathering. The order is to be implemented immediately and without any delay.

The court further directed the Chief Secretary to submit a report detailing the steps taken in compliance with the order, along with a status report, on the next hearing date, which has been set for June 13, 2023.

This order by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is expected to ensure the smooth functioning of NH-44, preventing any inconvenience to the public and maintaining law and order in the region. The court's intervention comes at a crucial time, as NH-44 connects the entire nation, spanning from Jammu and Kashmir to Kanya Kumari.

Date: June 6, 2023

Randeep Tanwar vs State of Haryana & others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Higway-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News