Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues Order to Ensure Unobstructed Flow of Traffic on National Highway-44

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 6, 2023

In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a crucial order to maintain the smooth movement of traffic on National Highway-44 (NH-44). The court's directive comes in response to an application filed by petitioner Randeep Tanwar in the case of CM-37-CWP-PIL-2023, challenging the gathering of a mob on the highway.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, sought the court's intervention to prevent a potential disruption caused by the mob gathering, which was allegedly in violation of the court's previous interim directions issued on September 23, 2022.

During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel presented an affidavit from the Chief Secretary of the Government of Haryana, which stated that talks were held with the leaders of Bhartiya Kisan Union (Union), the sixth respondent in the case. As a result of these discussions, the Union had agreed to remove the road blockade on NH-44, provided that the agricultural produce in the mandis (marketplaces) was protected from the rain.

However, the petitioner's counsel argued that the Union had once again threatened to resume the blockade if the purchase of Surajmukhi crop produce was not initiated promptly. He played video recordings from news channels in court, highlighting the Union leaders' demands to divert traffic from NH-44 as they prepared to block it again.

Considering the seriousness of the situation, the court, led by Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul and Justice Manisha Batra, deemed it appropriate to issue directions to the official respondents. The court ordered the officials to ensure the unobstructed flow of traffic on NH-44, emphasizing that the highway serves as a crucial lifeline connecting various parts of the country.

While issuing the directive, the court also cautioned the administration to exercise utmost restraint and resort to force only as a last resort in dispersing the gathering. The order is to be implemented immediately and without any delay.

The court further directed the Chief Secretary to submit a report detailing the steps taken in compliance with the order, along with a status report, on the next hearing date, which has been set for June 13, 2023.

This order by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is expected to ensure the smooth functioning of NH-44, preventing any inconvenience to the public and maintaining law and order in the region. The court's intervention comes at a crucial time, as NH-44 connects the entire nation, spanning from Jammu and Kashmir to Kanya Kumari.

Date: June 6, 2023

Randeep Tanwar vs State of Haryana & others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Higway-.pdf"]

Similar News