Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues Order to Ensure Unobstructed Flow of Traffic on National Highway-44

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 6, 2023

In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a crucial order to maintain the smooth movement of traffic on National Highway-44 (NH-44). The court's directive comes in response to an application filed by petitioner Randeep Tanwar in the case of CM-37-CWP-PIL-2023, challenging the gathering of a mob on the highway.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, sought the court's intervention to prevent a potential disruption caused by the mob gathering, which was allegedly in violation of the court's previous interim directions issued on September 23, 2022.

During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel presented an affidavit from the Chief Secretary of the Government of Haryana, which stated that talks were held with the leaders of Bhartiya Kisan Union (Union), the sixth respondent in the case. As a result of these discussions, the Union had agreed to remove the road blockade on NH-44, provided that the agricultural produce in the mandis (marketplaces) was protected from the rain.

However, the petitioner's counsel argued that the Union had once again threatened to resume the blockade if the purchase of Surajmukhi crop produce was not initiated promptly. He played video recordings from news channels in court, highlighting the Union leaders' demands to divert traffic from NH-44 as they prepared to block it again.

Considering the seriousness of the situation, the court, led by Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul and Justice Manisha Batra, deemed it appropriate to issue directions to the official respondents. The court ordered the officials to ensure the unobstructed flow of traffic on NH-44, emphasizing that the highway serves as a crucial lifeline connecting various parts of the country.

While issuing the directive, the court also cautioned the administration to exercise utmost restraint and resort to force only as a last resort in dispersing the gathering. The order is to be implemented immediately and without any delay.

The court further directed the Chief Secretary to submit a report detailing the steps taken in compliance with the order, along with a status report, on the next hearing date, which has been set for June 13, 2023.

This order by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is expected to ensure the smooth functioning of NH-44, preventing any inconvenience to the public and maintaining law and order in the region. The court's intervention comes at a crucial time, as NH-44 connects the entire nation, spanning from Jammu and Kashmir to Kanya Kumari.

Date: June 6, 2023

Randeep Tanwar vs State of Haryana & others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Higway-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News