Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

"Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to First-Time Offender in NDPS Act Case: Upholds Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI, has granted bail to Gurpreet Singh, a first-time offender, in a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The judgment, delivered on September 29, 2023, emphasizes the importance of a speedy trial and adherence to statutory provisions in NDPS cases.

The judgment noted, "The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 09.10.2021, and none of the 11 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. He is also a first-time offender with no other case registered against him."

The court considered the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It observed that in this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted, especially when two of Gurpreet Singh's co-accused, Gurjit Singh and Inderjit Singh, had been granted similar relief.

The judgment further highlighted the delay in the trial process and the need for bail. "The conclusion of trial will take some reasonable time, regardless of the direction issued by the High Court to conclude the same within one year from the date of framing of charges," it stated.

In its decision, the court ordered Gurpreet Singh to be released on bail, subject to specific conditions to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities. These conditions include regular appearances before the police station and a bond deposit.

This ruling aligns with recent Supreme Court precedents cited in the judgment, which emphasized the grant of bail to first-time offenders facing delays in trial proceedings. Notably, the judgment underscores the importance of balancing the interests of justice with the right to personal liberty, particularly in cases involving contraband substances.

The case was represented by Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the Petitioner, and Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, appearing as State Counsel.

Date of Decision:-29.09.2023

Gurpreet Singh.  vs  State of Punjab.

 

Latest Legal News