Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

"Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to First-Time Offender in NDPS Act Case: Upholds Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI, has granted bail to Gurpreet Singh, a first-time offender, in a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The judgment, delivered on September 29, 2023, emphasizes the importance of a speedy trial and adherence to statutory provisions in NDPS cases.

The judgment noted, "The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 09.10.2021, and none of the 11 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. He is also a first-time offender with no other case registered against him."

The court considered the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It observed that in this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted, especially when two of Gurpreet Singh's co-accused, Gurjit Singh and Inderjit Singh, had been granted similar relief.

The judgment further highlighted the delay in the trial process and the need for bail. "The conclusion of trial will take some reasonable time, regardless of the direction issued by the High Court to conclude the same within one year from the date of framing of charges," it stated.

In its decision, the court ordered Gurpreet Singh to be released on bail, subject to specific conditions to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities. These conditions include regular appearances before the police station and a bond deposit.

This ruling aligns with recent Supreme Court precedents cited in the judgment, which emphasized the grant of bail to first-time offenders facing delays in trial proceedings. Notably, the judgment underscores the importance of balancing the interests of justice with the right to personal liberty, particularly in cases involving contraband substances.

The case was represented by Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the Petitioner, and Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, appearing as State Counsel.

Date of Decision:-29.09.2023

Gurpreet Singh.  vs  State of Punjab.

 

Latest Legal News