Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

"Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to First-Time Offender in NDPS Act Case: Upholds Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI, has granted bail to Gurpreet Singh, a first-time offender, in a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The judgment, delivered on September 29, 2023, emphasizes the importance of a speedy trial and adherence to statutory provisions in NDPS cases.

The judgment noted, "The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 09.10.2021, and none of the 11 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. He is also a first-time offender with no other case registered against him."

The court considered the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It observed that in this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted, especially when two of Gurpreet Singh's co-accused, Gurjit Singh and Inderjit Singh, had been granted similar relief.

The judgment further highlighted the delay in the trial process and the need for bail. "The conclusion of trial will take some reasonable time, regardless of the direction issued by the High Court to conclude the same within one year from the date of framing of charges," it stated.

In its decision, the court ordered Gurpreet Singh to be released on bail, subject to specific conditions to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities. These conditions include regular appearances before the police station and a bond deposit.

This ruling aligns with recent Supreme Court precedents cited in the judgment, which emphasized the grant of bail to first-time offenders facing delays in trial proceedings. Notably, the judgment underscores the importance of balancing the interests of justice with the right to personal liberty, particularly in cases involving contraband substances.

The case was represented by Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the Petitioner, and Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, appearing as State Counsel.

Date of Decision:-29.09.2023

Gurpreet Singh.  vs  State of Punjab.

 

Latest Legal News