Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Writ Petition, Affirms Authority’s Decision to Order Fresh Inquiry

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a chargesheet and dismissal order in the case of Sawran Singh versus State of Punjab and another. Justice Pankaj Jain, presiding over the case, upheld the authority’s decision to order a fresh inquiry after the petitioner raised concerns about fairness during the initial proceedings.

Justice Jain stated in the judgment, “The authority acted in accordance with the regulations by ordering a fresh inquiry when the petitioner raised concerns about fairness. The right to receive the report of the Inquiry Officer is an essential part of the reasonable opportunity of defending oneself.”

The petitioner, who was employed as a Clerk with the respondent Board, had been served with a chargesheet on July 30, 1990. Following a departmental inquiry, the petitioner was found guilty, leading to the issuance of a dismissal order. However, the petitioner alleged that he was not dealt with fairly during the inquiry and pleaded innocence.

After considering the petitioner’s concerns, the authority opted to withdraw the show cause notice and ordered a fresh inquiry. Despite being aware of the proceedings, the petitioner deliberately chose not to participate in the second inquiry. Consequently, the authority dismissed the petitioner from services based on the fresh inquiry report.

The court emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the delinquent employee to respond to the findings of the inquiry officer before the authority made its own conclusions. Justice Jain added, “Denial of this right would be a denial of fair opportunity and natural justice.”

The judgment cited legal precedents, including the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad vs. B. Karunakaran, to support the conclusion that the authority’s action was in line with the principles of natural justice.

Date of decision : 11.05.2023

Sawran Singh   vs State of Punjab and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Swaran-vs-State-PH-HC-15-May1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News