Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Deletion of Alleged Husband's Name from Petitioner's Passport

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a directive to delete the name of the alleged husband from the petitioner's passport. The judgment was passed by Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 3rd July 2023 in a case filed by Harkirat Kaur against the Union of India and others.

The petitioner, represented by Ms. Neha Jain, sought the court's intervention to remove the name of Partap Singh from her passport (bearing No.W9870254) as she had not solemnized marriage with him. The inclusion of his name was solely for the purpose of travel, which did not materialize.

Justice Jagmohan Bansal, in the oral judgment, stated, "The petitioner could not solemnize marriage with Partap Singh, thus, she wants to get the name of Partap Singh deleted from her passport." The court acknowledged the submission made by Ms. Shweta Nahata, advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 representing the Union of India, who accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents.

Ms. Nahata further assured the court that the competent authority would review the petitioner's representation and legal notice within a period of six weeks. In light of this statement, the court disposed of the petition and directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order on the petitioner's representation and legal notice within the specified timeframe.

This ruling emphasizes the importance of accuracy in passport records and recognizes the petitioner's right to have her passport reflect her correct marital status. The decision serves as a reminder that individuals have the right to seek appropriate corrections to their personal identification documents.

The court's decision provides relief to Harkirat Kaur, who will now have the opportunity to have her passport updated accordingly. The judgment also highlights the significance of timely resolution of such matters by the authorities responsible for passport issuance and administration.

 DATE OF DECISION: 03.07.2023

Harkirat Kaur vs Union of India and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Harkirat-Vs-UOI-03-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News