Deputy Registrar Of Chits Competent To Act As Arbitrator And Issue Recovery Certificates; Not Limited To Registrar Alone: Telangana High Court Custody With Biological Mother Presumed Lawful; Writ Of Habeas Corpus Not A Remedy To Enforce Foreign Court’s Return Orders: Bombay High Court Ocular Testimony Of Victim Prevails Over Medical Evidence In Rape Cases If Found Credible: Allahabad High Court Condonation Of Delay Should Follow Justice-Oriented Liberal Approach, Unintentional Delay Shouldn't Block Justice: Calcutta High Court Digital Banking Fraud: Clicking Suspicious Links Constitutes Customer Negligence; Liability Cannot Be Fastened On Bank Without Forensic Evidence: Delhi High Court Vexatious Matrimonial Complaints Filed As Counterblast To Divorce Is Abuse Of Process; Allegations Against In-Laws Must Be Specific: Gujarat High Court Sale Deed Executed By Son During Father's Lifetime Based On Manipulated Records Is Void Ab Initio: Karnataka High Court Charge Sheet E-Filed After Court Hours Deemed Filed Next Day; Accused Entitled To Default Bail: Kerala High Court Landowners Can't Use Antedated Stamp Papers To Defeat Ceiling Limits; Section 22 Land Reforms Act Prevails Over Registration Act: Madras High Court Rajasthan High Court Orders Tehsildar To Personally Pay ₹2 Lakh Compensation For 53-Day Illegal Detention Despite Suspension Of Sentence Mere Existence Of Dargah Doesn't Grant Jurisdiction To Waqf Board; Statutory Survey Under Sections 4 & 5 Is Mandatory: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Sets Aside Interim Stay On Delhi Race Club Eviction; Says Courts Can't Halt Statutory Proceedings Without Recording Finding On Prima Facie Case

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Deletion of Alleged Husband's Name from Petitioner's Passport

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a directive to delete the name of the alleged husband from the petitioner's passport. The judgment was passed by Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 3rd July 2023 in a case filed by Harkirat Kaur against the Union of India and others.

The petitioner, represented by Ms. Neha Jain, sought the court's intervention to remove the name of Partap Singh from her passport (bearing No.W9870254) as she had not solemnized marriage with him. The inclusion of his name was solely for the purpose of travel, which did not materialize.

Justice Jagmohan Bansal, in the oral judgment, stated, "The petitioner could not solemnize marriage with Partap Singh, thus, she wants to get the name of Partap Singh deleted from her passport." The court acknowledged the submission made by Ms. Shweta Nahata, advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 representing the Union of India, who accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents.

Ms. Nahata further assured the court that the competent authority would review the petitioner's representation and legal notice within a period of six weeks. In light of this statement, the court disposed of the petition and directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order on the petitioner's representation and legal notice within the specified timeframe.

This ruling emphasizes the importance of accuracy in passport records and recognizes the petitioner's right to have her passport reflect her correct marital status. The decision serves as a reminder that individuals have the right to seek appropriate corrections to their personal identification documents.

The court's decision provides relief to Harkirat Kaur, who will now have the opportunity to have her passport updated accordingly. The judgment also highlights the significance of timely resolution of such matters by the authorities responsible for passport issuance and administration.

 DATE OF DECISION: 03.07.2023

Harkirat Kaur vs Union of India and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Harkirat-Vs-UOI-03-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News