Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Deletion of Alleged Husband's Name from Petitioner's Passport

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a directive to delete the name of the alleged husband from the petitioner's passport. The judgment was passed by Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 3rd July 2023 in a case filed by Harkirat Kaur against the Union of India and others.

The petitioner, represented by Ms. Neha Jain, sought the court's intervention to remove the name of Partap Singh from her passport (bearing No.W9870254) as she had not solemnized marriage with him. The inclusion of his name was solely for the purpose of travel, which did not materialize.

Justice Jagmohan Bansal, in the oral judgment, stated, "The petitioner could not solemnize marriage with Partap Singh, thus, she wants to get the name of Partap Singh deleted from her passport." The court acknowledged the submission made by Ms. Shweta Nahata, advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 representing the Union of India, who accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents.

Ms. Nahata further assured the court that the competent authority would review the petitioner's representation and legal notice within a period of six weeks. In light of this statement, the court disposed of the petition and directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order on the petitioner's representation and legal notice within the specified timeframe.

This ruling emphasizes the importance of accuracy in passport records and recognizes the petitioner's right to have her passport reflect her correct marital status. The decision serves as a reminder that individuals have the right to seek appropriate corrections to their personal identification documents.

The court's decision provides relief to Harkirat Kaur, who will now have the opportunity to have her passport updated accordingly. The judgment also highlights the significance of timely resolution of such matters by the authorities responsible for passport issuance and administration.

 DATE OF DECISION: 03.07.2023

Harkirat Kaur vs Union of India and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Harkirat-Vs-UOI-03-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News