Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Public Trusts Under RTI: Distinct from Educational Institutions They Run, Bound by RTI Based on Financial Support from State - Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court clarifies the application of the Right to Information (RTI) Act to Public Trusts and educational institutions managed by them. The key issue was whether Public Trusts registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950, and running institutions receiving state grants, are duty-bound to supply information under the RTI Act 2005.

The appeal raised the question of whether a Public Trust, receiving state grants for its institutions, falls within the scope of 'public authority' under the RTI Act, thereby obligating it to provide requested information. The court examined several previous judgments reflecting discordant views on the issue, focusing on the distinction between Public Trusts and the educational institutions they administer.

The Court differentiated between Public Trusts and their educational institutions. It was observed that Public Trusts are not created by statute but are recognized and registered based on their trust deed, making them largely private bodies. The Court emphasized that only if these Trusts or their institutions receive substantial financing from the State do they come under the ambit of RTI. Justice Gharote noted, "The educational institutions, owing their existence to the Public Trust, do not automatically make the Trust a public authority under the RTI Act."

The Court further observed that financial assistance to educational institutions must be evaluated in the context of state policy and the extent of financing. It clarified that merely receiving state grants does not make a Public Trust a 'Public Authority' under RTI unless it is substantially financed by the government.

The Court held that a Public Trust is not obligated to supply information under the RTI Act unless it falls within Section 2(h)(i), implying substantial state financing or control. Educational institutions managed by Public Trusts may fall under RTI if state financing is substantial. The Charity Commissioner is not bound to provide information collected under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act if it falls under exempted categories of the RTI Act.

Decision Dated - 1st March 2024.

"People Welfare Society vs State Information Commissioner & Ors." -

Latest Legal News