CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Public Trusts Under RTI: Distinct from Educational Institutions They Run, Bound by RTI Based on Financial Support from State - Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court clarifies the application of the Right to Information (RTI) Act to Public Trusts and educational institutions managed by them. The key issue was whether Public Trusts registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950, and running institutions receiving state grants, are duty-bound to supply information under the RTI Act 2005.

The appeal raised the question of whether a Public Trust, receiving state grants for its institutions, falls within the scope of 'public authority' under the RTI Act, thereby obligating it to provide requested information. The court examined several previous judgments reflecting discordant views on the issue, focusing on the distinction between Public Trusts and the educational institutions they administer.

The Court differentiated between Public Trusts and their educational institutions. It was observed that Public Trusts are not created by statute but are recognized and registered based on their trust deed, making them largely private bodies. The Court emphasized that only if these Trusts or their institutions receive substantial financing from the State do they come under the ambit of RTI. Justice Gharote noted, "The educational institutions, owing their existence to the Public Trust, do not automatically make the Trust a public authority under the RTI Act."

The Court further observed that financial assistance to educational institutions must be evaluated in the context of state policy and the extent of financing. It clarified that merely receiving state grants does not make a Public Trust a 'Public Authority' under RTI unless it is substantially financed by the government.

The Court held that a Public Trust is not obligated to supply information under the RTI Act unless it falls within Section 2(h)(i), implying substantial state financing or control. Educational institutions managed by Public Trusts may fall under RTI if state financing is substantial. The Charity Commissioner is not bound to provide information collected under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act if it falls under exempted categories of the RTI Act.

Decision Dated - 1st March 2024.

"People Welfare Society vs State Information Commissioner & Ors." -

Latest Legal News