Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

Public Trusts Under RTI: Distinct from Educational Institutions They Run, Bound by RTI Based on Financial Support from State - Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court clarifies the application of the Right to Information (RTI) Act to Public Trusts and educational institutions managed by them. The key issue was whether Public Trusts registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950, and running institutions receiving state grants, are duty-bound to supply information under the RTI Act 2005.

The appeal raised the question of whether a Public Trust, receiving state grants for its institutions, falls within the scope of 'public authority' under the RTI Act, thereby obligating it to provide requested information. The court examined several previous judgments reflecting discordant views on the issue, focusing on the distinction between Public Trusts and the educational institutions they administer.

The Court differentiated between Public Trusts and their educational institutions. It was observed that Public Trusts are not created by statute but are recognized and registered based on their trust deed, making them largely private bodies. The Court emphasized that only if these Trusts or their institutions receive substantial financing from the State do they come under the ambit of RTI. Justice Gharote noted, "The educational institutions, owing their existence to the Public Trust, do not automatically make the Trust a public authority under the RTI Act."

The Court further observed that financial assistance to educational institutions must be evaluated in the context of state policy and the extent of financing. It clarified that merely receiving state grants does not make a Public Trust a 'Public Authority' under RTI unless it is substantially financed by the government.

The Court held that a Public Trust is not obligated to supply information under the RTI Act unless it falls within Section 2(h)(i), implying substantial state financing or control. Educational institutions managed by Public Trusts may fall under RTI if state financing is substantial. The Charity Commissioner is not bound to provide information collected under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act if it falls under exempted categories of the RTI Act.

Decision Dated - 1st March 2024.

"People Welfare Society vs State Information Commissioner & Ors." -

Similar News