Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

"Prosecutrix Eloped with Intent to Marry": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Controversial Rape Case

05 September 2024 5:22 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Delhi today upheld the acquittal accused and another respondent in a highly scrutinized rape case. The State had appealed the acquittal verdict, claiming that the trial court's judgment was based on "presumptions and surmises."

"In our considered opinion, the prosecutrix had eloped from her parents' house with their money and jewellery with intent to marry respondent No.1-accused," observed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna. The judgment elaborates that the prosecutrix and the respondent were, in fact, married and had a child out of the wedlock.

The case was initially filed in 2008 at the Shahbad police station in Delhi, accusing Mahadev and another respondent of multiple charges including kidnapping, rape, and illegal confinement. The prosecutrix, who was studying in class VII at the time of the alleged incidents, had claimed that Mahadev proposed friendship to her and later kidnapped and raped her on multiple occasions.

Casting doubt on the credibility of the prosecutrix, the Court noted material contradictions in her statements. "There are material contradictions in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Sections 164 Cr.P.C. & 161 Cr.P.C. as well as her statement made before the Court," the judgment states. The Court also pointed to the prosecutrix's intent to separate from her husband as a possible motive behind the allegations.

Representing the State, Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Tarang Srivastava argued that the victim was underage at the time and that the lower court had not adequately considered the evidence. Conversely, the defense counsel contended that the acquittal was justified based on witness testimony and available evidence.

With today's judgment, the High Court has effectively put an end to a lengthy and highly publicized trial, emphasizing the need for courts to critically examine all evidence and testimony before making judgments in sensitive cases such as this one.

 Date of Decision: September 12, 2023

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) vs MAHADEV @ SHARAD & ANR.       

Latest Legal News