Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

"Prosecutrix Eloped with Intent to Marry": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Controversial Rape Case

05 September 2024 5:22 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Delhi today upheld the acquittal accused and another respondent in a highly scrutinized rape case. The State had appealed the acquittal verdict, claiming that the trial court's judgment was based on "presumptions and surmises."

"In our considered opinion, the prosecutrix had eloped from her parents' house with their money and jewellery with intent to marry respondent No.1-accused," observed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna. The judgment elaborates that the prosecutrix and the respondent were, in fact, married and had a child out of the wedlock.

The case was initially filed in 2008 at the Shahbad police station in Delhi, accusing Mahadev and another respondent of multiple charges including kidnapping, rape, and illegal confinement. The prosecutrix, who was studying in class VII at the time of the alleged incidents, had claimed that Mahadev proposed friendship to her and later kidnapped and raped her on multiple occasions.

Casting doubt on the credibility of the prosecutrix, the Court noted material contradictions in her statements. "There are material contradictions in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Sections 164 Cr.P.C. & 161 Cr.P.C. as well as her statement made before the Court," the judgment states. The Court also pointed to the prosecutrix's intent to separate from her husband as a possible motive behind the allegations.

Representing the State, Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Tarang Srivastava argued that the victim was underage at the time and that the lower court had not adequately considered the evidence. Conversely, the defense counsel contended that the acquittal was justified based on witness testimony and available evidence.

With today's judgment, the High Court has effectively put an end to a lengthy and highly publicized trial, emphasizing the need for courts to critically examine all evidence and testimony before making judgments in sensitive cases such as this one.

 Date of Decision: September 12, 2023

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) vs MAHADEV @ SHARAD & ANR.       

Latest Legal News