Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Prosecution Fails to Prove Complicity of Accused Due to Lack of Direct Evidence; Acquitted Under Section 27A for Insufficient Evidence of Financing - Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court has acquitted Login Das while maintaining the conviction of Narayan Yadav under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act but setting aside his conviction under Section 27A.

The case primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly Sections 21(c) and 27A, dealing with possession and financing of illegal narcotics trade.

The appellants, Narayan Yadav and Login Das, were convicted for offences under Sections 21(c) and 27A of the NDPS Act. The case involved the recovery of phensedyl cough syrup from Yadav and alleged financing of the illegal narcotics trade.

 

 

Detailed Court Assessment:

 

 

Recovery from Narayan Yadav: The Court observed that the recovery of narcotics from Narayan Yadav's residence was duly established. Despite no independent witnesses, the consistency in official witnesses' testimonies and corroborative documentary evidence were deemed sufficient.

Compliance with Procedural Aspects: The Court noted that compliance with Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act was not required due to the presence of gazetted officers during the raid. The chain of custody and compliance with Section 52A were adequately maintained, as evidenced by the certification of the seized narcotics by the Judicial Magistrate.

 

Absence of Direct Evidence Against Login Das: The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove Login Das's complicity due to the lack of direct evidence. The reliance on a seizure list from another case was insufficient to establish his involvement in the narcotics trade, leading to his acquittal.

Conviction under Section 21(c) and Acquittal under Section 27A for Narayan Yadav: While Yadav's conviction under Section 21(c) was upheld due to the established recovery of narcotics, his conviction under Section 27A was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his involvement in financing illegal trade.

Decision: The Court allowed the appeal CRA 97 of 2020, acquitting Login Das, and partly allowed the appeal CRA 236 of 2020, maintaining Narayan Yadav's conviction under Section 21(c) but acquitting him under Section 27A.

 Date of Decision: 05.04.2024.

Login Das @ Lagin Rabi Das Vs. The State of West Bengal and Narayan Yadav @ Jadab Vs. The State of West Bengal,

Similar News