Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Prosecution Fails to Prove Complicity of Accused Due to Lack of Direct Evidence; Acquitted Under Section 27A for Insufficient Evidence of Financing - Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court has acquitted Login Das while maintaining the conviction of Narayan Yadav under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act but setting aside his conviction under Section 27A.

The case primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly Sections 21(c) and 27A, dealing with possession and financing of illegal narcotics trade.

The appellants, Narayan Yadav and Login Das, were convicted for offences under Sections 21(c) and 27A of the NDPS Act. The case involved the recovery of phensedyl cough syrup from Yadav and alleged financing of the illegal narcotics trade.

 

 

Detailed Court Assessment:

 

 

Recovery from Narayan Yadav: The Court observed that the recovery of narcotics from Narayan Yadav's residence was duly established. Despite no independent witnesses, the consistency in official witnesses' testimonies and corroborative documentary evidence were deemed sufficient.

Compliance with Procedural Aspects: The Court noted that compliance with Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act was not required due to the presence of gazetted officers during the raid. The chain of custody and compliance with Section 52A were adequately maintained, as evidenced by the certification of the seized narcotics by the Judicial Magistrate.

 

Absence of Direct Evidence Against Login Das: The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove Login Das's complicity due to the lack of direct evidence. The reliance on a seizure list from another case was insufficient to establish his involvement in the narcotics trade, leading to his acquittal.

Conviction under Section 21(c) and Acquittal under Section 27A for Narayan Yadav: While Yadav's conviction under Section 21(c) was upheld due to the established recovery of narcotics, his conviction under Section 27A was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his involvement in financing illegal trade.

Decision: The Court allowed the appeal CRA 97 of 2020, acquitting Login Das, and partly allowed the appeal CRA 236 of 2020, maintaining Narayan Yadav's conviction under Section 21(c) but acquitting him under Section 27A.

 Date of Decision: 05.04.2024.

Login Das @ Lagin Rabi Das Vs. The State of West Bengal and Narayan Yadav @ Jadab Vs. The State of West Bengal,

Latest Legal News