Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Prolonged Incarceration Not Justified: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a judgment emphasized the importance of personal liberty and granted bail to the petitioner in a case registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN, highlighted the undue delay in the petitioner's incarceration and the lack of criminal antecedents.

The High Court considered the argument presented by the petitioner's counsel, who pointed out that an unauthorized officer had conducted the search before an authorized officer arrived, raising questions about the legality of the search.

Justice Pankaj Jain referred to several recent Supreme Court orders in similar cases to support the decision. He quoted from one such order, stating, "The prolonged incarceration, generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, and in such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment also referred to other cases where bail was granted to individuals who had spent a considerable time in custody, further emphasizing the principle that liberty should not be unduly restricted.

The High Court, while granting bail, imposed specific conditions on the petitioner to ensure that he does not misuse the liberty granted. These conditions include not tampering with evidence, attending all court dates, not committing any further offenses, depositing any passport with the trial court, and providing contact information to the police authorities.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding personal liberty, especially in cases where individuals have been in custody for extended periods without trial. It underscores the need for a balanced approach to justice, ensuring that the fundamental right to liberty is respected even in cases involving serious offenses.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

Balvir Chand vs State of Punjab

Similar News