Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Prolonged Incarceration Not Justified: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a judgment emphasized the importance of personal liberty and granted bail to the petitioner in a case registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN, highlighted the undue delay in the petitioner's incarceration and the lack of criminal antecedents.

The High Court considered the argument presented by the petitioner's counsel, who pointed out that an unauthorized officer had conducted the search before an authorized officer arrived, raising questions about the legality of the search.

Justice Pankaj Jain referred to several recent Supreme Court orders in similar cases to support the decision. He quoted from one such order, stating, "The prolonged incarceration, generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, and in such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment also referred to other cases where bail was granted to individuals who had spent a considerable time in custody, further emphasizing the principle that liberty should not be unduly restricted.

The High Court, while granting bail, imposed specific conditions on the petitioner to ensure that he does not misuse the liberty granted. These conditions include not tampering with evidence, attending all court dates, not committing any further offenses, depositing any passport with the trial court, and providing contact information to the police authorities.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding personal liberty, especially in cases where individuals have been in custody for extended periods without trial. It underscores the need for a balanced approach to justice, ensuring that the fundamental right to liberty is respected even in cases involving serious offenses.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

Balvir Chand vs State of Punjab

Similar News