Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Preventing Vagrancy and Destitution: Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance for Divorcee’s Children Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reaffirmed the essence of Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), emphasizing its role in preventing vagrancy and destitution. The court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, dismissed a criminal revision petition (Crl.RC(MD)No.611 of 2023) filed by R. Ochap pan against an order granting maintenance to his children.

The petitioner, Ochappan, had challenged the maintenance awarded to his daughter, Keerthana, and his minor son. The original maintenance petition was filed by Keerthana, seeking support for herself and her brother following her parents’ divorce. The trial court initially dismissed the petition on procedural grounds, questioning Keerthana’s standing as a natural guardian for her brother. However, the decision was later overturned by a revisional court, granting monthly maintenance of Rs. 7,500 and Rs. 5,000 to Keerthana and her brother, respectively.

In his judgment, Justice Ramakrishnan highlighted the role of Section 125 Cr.P.C. as a social welfare tool, aimed at ensuring social justice to women, children, and destitute parents. “The object is to prevent vagrancy and destitution. It provides a speedy remedy for the supply of food, clothing, and shelter to the deserted wife,” the court observed, citing various Supreme Court decisions to reinforce its interpretation.

The High Court upheld the revisional court’s decision, stating that there was no legal impediment for Keerthana to file the maintenance petition on behalf of her minor brother. The court rejected the petitioner’s argument regarding his salary constraints and emphasized the current cost of living in determining the maintenance amount.

This judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding social welfare laws and providing relief to those in distress, particularly in cases involving maintenance for children after divorce. The court’s decision is a significant step towards ensuring that children of separated parents are not left in a state of financial vulnerability.

Date of Decision: 09.01.2024

R.Ochappan VS Keerthana

 

Latest Legal News