Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Preventing Vagrancy and Destitution: Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance for Divorcee’s Children Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reaffirmed the essence of Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), emphasizing its role in preventing vagrancy and destitution. The court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, dismissed a criminal revision petition (Crl.RC(MD)No.611 of 2023) filed by R. Ochap pan against an order granting maintenance to his children.

The petitioner, Ochappan, had challenged the maintenance awarded to his daughter, Keerthana, and his minor son. The original maintenance petition was filed by Keerthana, seeking support for herself and her brother following her parents’ divorce. The trial court initially dismissed the petition on procedural grounds, questioning Keerthana’s standing as a natural guardian for her brother. However, the decision was later overturned by a revisional court, granting monthly maintenance of Rs. 7,500 and Rs. 5,000 to Keerthana and her brother, respectively.

In his judgment, Justice Ramakrishnan highlighted the role of Section 125 Cr.P.C. as a social welfare tool, aimed at ensuring social justice to women, children, and destitute parents. “The object is to prevent vagrancy and destitution. It provides a speedy remedy for the supply of food, clothing, and shelter to the deserted wife,” the court observed, citing various Supreme Court decisions to reinforce its interpretation.

The High Court upheld the revisional court’s decision, stating that there was no legal impediment for Keerthana to file the maintenance petition on behalf of her minor brother. The court rejected the petitioner’s argument regarding his salary constraints and emphasized the current cost of living in determining the maintenance amount.

This judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding social welfare laws and providing relief to those in distress, particularly in cases involving maintenance for children after divorce. The court’s decision is a significant step towards ensuring that children of separated parents are not left in a state of financial vulnerability.

Date of Decision: 09.01.2024

R.Ochappan VS Keerthana

 

Latest Legal News