Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Preparatory Works Essential for Public Safety: Karnataka High Court Allows Preparatory Work for Durga Pooja

07 October 2024 2:29 PM

By: sayum


Karnataka High Court in Sri. Shymol Santra & Others v. Commissioner, BBMP & Another (W.P. No. 27351 of 2024) granted permission to the petitioners to undertake preparatory works for Durga Pooja at Bannappa Park, Bengaluru, before the official commencement of the festivities on October 9, 2024. The Court ruled that preparatory works such as erecting pandals and stages were necessary for the safe conduct of the festival, but emphasized that no rituals should take place before the official period.

The petitioners, members of the Navajagran Public Sri. Durgapuja Samithi, sought permission to enter the Bannappa Park Playground in Sampangiramanagar, Bengaluru, from October 6, 2024, to prepare for the upcoming Durga Pooja celebrations. Despite the BBMP granting permission for the event from October 9-13, 2024, they were not allowed to begin preparations earlier. The petitioners approached the High Court, seeking relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

The primary issue was whether the petitioners should be allowed to begin preparatory works before the official start of the event. The petitioners argued that setting up pandals, rainproof shamianas, and stages was crucial for public safety and efficient organization. The BBMP, through its counsel, clarified that they had no objections as long as the preparatory works were restricted to October 6-8, 2024, and no pooja activities commenced before October 9, 2024.

Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar, after hearing both parties, allowed the petitioners to undertake preparatory works for the Durga Pooja. The Court noted:

"It is necessary to carry out preparatory work such as erection of pandal/rainproof shamiana, cleaning the place, building of solid stage with a platform/passage leading to the stage... prior to 09.10.2024."

The Court also emphasized that no pooja or related rituals should begin before the official dates. The permission was granted solely for preparatory activities to ensure smooth conduct of the event.

The Karnataka High Court permitted the petitioners to carry out preparatory works for the Durga Pooja from October 6-8, 2024, while ensuring compliance with safety regulations. However, the Court restricted the performance of pooja rituals to the official period from October 9-13, 2024.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Sri. Shymol Santra & Others v. Commissioner, BBMP & Another

Latest Legal News