Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

P&H HC Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Charges under Sections 304 and 427 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21April 2023, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the framing of charges against the petitioner under Sections 304 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving the death of three persons due to extreme negligence and rash driving of an oil tanker.

The petitioner argued that since there was no allegation of him being under the influence of liquor, the case should bAe treated as rash and negligent driving under Section 304A IPC. However, the Court observed that the material on record indicated that the allegations against the petitioner showed extreme negligence and rashness while driving the oil tanker, leading to the death of three persons.

Justice Vivek Puri, who presided over the case, held that a charge under Section 304 IPC could be framed even on the basis of strong suspicion, if supported with material on record. The Court further noted that while the charge framed by the trial Court may not be properly worded, the error could be corrected by invoking the provisions of Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), which allows for the amendment of the charge at any stage of the trial.

The petition was dismissed, and the trial Court was advised to look into the alteration/amendment of the charge as per the provisions of Section 216 Cr.P.C., considering the observations made by the High Court.

Date of Decision: 21.04.2023

Chhinda Singh  VS State of Punjab                    

 

Latest Legal News