Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

P&H HC Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Charges under Sections 304 and 427 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21April 2023, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the framing of charges against the petitioner under Sections 304 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving the death of three persons due to extreme negligence and rash driving of an oil tanker.

The petitioner argued that since there was no allegation of him being under the influence of liquor, the case should bAe treated as rash and negligent driving under Section 304A IPC. However, the Court observed that the material on record indicated that the allegations against the petitioner showed extreme negligence and rashness while driving the oil tanker, leading to the death of three persons.

Justice Vivek Puri, who presided over the case, held that a charge under Section 304 IPC could be framed even on the basis of strong suspicion, if supported with material on record. The Court further noted that while the charge framed by the trial Court may not be properly worded, the error could be corrected by invoking the provisions of Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), which allows for the amendment of the charge at any stage of the trial.

The petition was dismissed, and the trial Court was advised to look into the alteration/amendment of the charge as per the provisions of Section 216 Cr.P.C., considering the observations made by the High Court.

Date of Decision: 21.04.2023

Chhinda Singh  VS State of Punjab                    

 

Similar News