Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court

P&H HC Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Charges under Sections 304 and 427 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21April 2023, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the framing of charges against the petitioner under Sections 304 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving the death of three persons due to extreme negligence and rash driving of an oil tanker.

The petitioner argued that since there was no allegation of him being under the influence of liquor, the case should bAe treated as rash and negligent driving under Section 304A IPC. However, the Court observed that the material on record indicated that the allegations against the petitioner showed extreme negligence and rashness while driving the oil tanker, leading to the death of three persons.

Justice Vivek Puri, who presided over the case, held that a charge under Section 304 IPC could be framed even on the basis of strong suspicion, if supported with material on record. The Court further noted that while the charge framed by the trial Court may not be properly worded, the error could be corrected by invoking the provisions of Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), which allows for the amendment of the charge at any stage of the trial.

The petition was dismissed, and the trial Court was advised to look into the alteration/amendment of the charge as per the provisions of Section 216 Cr.P.C., considering the observations made by the High Court.

Date of Decision: 21.04.2023

Chhinda Singh  VS State of Punjab                    

 

Latest Legal News