Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

P&H HC Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Charges under Sections 304 and 427 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21April 2023, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the framing of charges against the petitioner under Sections 304 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving the death of three persons due to extreme negligence and rash driving of an oil tanker.

The petitioner argued that since there was no allegation of him being under the influence of liquor, the case should bAe treated as rash and negligent driving under Section 304A IPC. However, the Court observed that the material on record indicated that the allegations against the petitioner showed extreme negligence and rashness while driving the oil tanker, leading to the death of three persons.

Justice Vivek Puri, who presided over the case, held that a charge under Section 304 IPC could be framed even on the basis of strong suspicion, if supported with material on record. The Court further noted that while the charge framed by the trial Court may not be properly worded, the error could be corrected by invoking the provisions of Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), which allows for the amendment of the charge at any stage of the trial.

The petition was dismissed, and the trial Court was advised to look into the alteration/amendment of the charge as per the provisions of Section 216 Cr.P.C., considering the observations made by the High Court.

Date of Decision: 21.04.2023

Chhinda Singh  VS State of Punjab                    

 

Latest Legal News