Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

P&H HC Directs Gram Panchayat to Construct Road for Emergency Medical Aid; Frivolous Petition Costs Imposed on Sarpanch

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has directed a Gram Panchayat to construct a road for emergency medical aid, emphasizing the constitutional obligation to provide convenient access to medical facilities. The court dismissed a writ petition filed by Gram Panchayat Badaliyan, challenging the construction of the road for an unauthorized occupant. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari.

The petitioner argued that the road construction, directed by the Collector of the revenue district, was intended solely for the personal benefit of the unauthorized occupant, respondent No. 9. The Gram Panchayat contended that the road should benefit the entire village and had passed a resolution opposing the construction.

Addressing the arguments, the court stated that the Gram Panchayat had a constitutional duty to provide road access for emergency medical aid to the villagers. It emphasized that the right to life, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, encompassed the duty of the State to ensure convenient access, including ambulance roads, for medical emergencies.

The court held that even if the road construction primarily benefited a single individual, it did not provide sufficient grounds for the Gram Panchayat to resist the Collector's directions. It noted that providing road access to every villager, including a solitary homestead, was essential to fulfill the right to life. This would enable timely medical care by facilitating ambulance services to reach any citizen in need.

Dismissing the writ petition, the court deemed it frivolous and possibly motivated by malafides. It imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the Sarpanch (head) of Gram Panchayat Badaliyan, who filed the petition. The Sarpanch was directed to deposit the costs with the Treasurer of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association.

This judgment serves as a significant reminder of the constitutional duty to prioritize the right to life and ensure accessibility to essential services, particularly in emergency situations. The court's decision underscores the obligation of Gram Panchayats to provide roads for emergency medical aid and discourages the filing of frivolous petitions, emphasizing the potential consequences for those involved.

Date of Decision : May 08, 2023

GRAM PANCHAYAT BADALIYAN vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER TO GOVT. PUNJAB AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News