Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims

P&H HC Directs Gram Panchayat to Construct Road for Emergency Medical Aid; Frivolous Petition Costs Imposed on Sarpanch

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has directed a Gram Panchayat to construct a road for emergency medical aid, emphasizing the constitutional obligation to provide convenient access to medical facilities. The court dismissed a writ petition filed by Gram Panchayat Badaliyan, challenging the construction of the road for an unauthorized occupant. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari.

The petitioner argued that the road construction, directed by the Collector of the revenue district, was intended solely for the personal benefit of the unauthorized occupant, respondent No. 9. The Gram Panchayat contended that the road should benefit the entire village and had passed a resolution opposing the construction.

Addressing the arguments, the court stated that the Gram Panchayat had a constitutional duty to provide road access for emergency medical aid to the villagers. It emphasized that the right to life, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, encompassed the duty of the State to ensure convenient access, including ambulance roads, for medical emergencies.

The court held that even if the road construction primarily benefited a single individual, it did not provide sufficient grounds for the Gram Panchayat to resist the Collector's directions. It noted that providing road access to every villager, including a solitary homestead, was essential to fulfill the right to life. This would enable timely medical care by facilitating ambulance services to reach any citizen in need.

Dismissing the writ petition, the court deemed it frivolous and possibly motivated by malafides. It imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the Sarpanch (head) of Gram Panchayat Badaliyan, who filed the petition. The Sarpanch was directed to deposit the costs with the Treasurer of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association.

This judgment serves as a significant reminder of the constitutional duty to prioritize the right to life and ensure accessibility to essential services, particularly in emergency situations. The court's decision underscores the obligation of Gram Panchayats to provide roads for emergency medical aid and discourages the filing of frivolous petitions, emphasizing the potential consequences for those involved.

Date of Decision : May 08, 2023

GRAM PANCHAYAT BADALIYAN vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER TO GOVT. PUNJAB AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News