Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Petitioners not Owners but Tenants: High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants by Gram Panchayat

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has upheld the eviction orders against petitioners who claimed to be 'Gair Marusi' tenants of land owned by the Gram Panchayat. The bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lalit Batra delivered the verdict on January 22, 2024, in the case of Siri Ram & Others vs. The Collector, District Faridabad & Others (CWP-7272-1996).

The petitioners challenged the concurrent verdicts of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector and the Appellate Authority, arguing that they held possession of the lands as 'Gair Marusi'. However, the court observed, "The petitioners, who are not the owners of the disputed lands, but rather the Gram Panchayat concerned, is the admitted owner of the petition lands, thus being both valid and lawful."

The High Court extensively analyzed the legal status of the petitioners as tenants, referencing Annexures P-1 and P-2 from previous court proceedings, which had declared the petitioners as tenants over the disputed lands. Despite this, the court found that the Gram Panchayat retained the right to evict, as stated in the operative part of Annexure P-1, "The plaintiffs are in possession of the land as tenant and as such, the findings of the learned Trial Court on issue No.1, 2 and 3 are set aside and the issues are decided in favour of the plaintiffs."

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming the eviction orders dated 31.01.1995 (Annexure P-3) and 07.09.1995 (Annexure P-4). This decision clarifies the rights of Gram Panchayats in relation to land tenure and eviction processes, particularly when dealing with tenants who do not have ownership rights.

Date of Decision: 20 January  2024

Siri Ram And Others VS The Collector, District Faridabad And Others

 

Latest Legal News