Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Petitioners not Owners but Tenants: High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants by Gram Panchayat

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has upheld the eviction orders against petitioners who claimed to be 'Gair Marusi' tenants of land owned by the Gram Panchayat. The bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lalit Batra delivered the verdict on January 22, 2024, in the case of Siri Ram & Others vs. The Collector, District Faridabad & Others (CWP-7272-1996).

The petitioners challenged the concurrent verdicts of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector and the Appellate Authority, arguing that they held possession of the lands as 'Gair Marusi'. However, the court observed, "The petitioners, who are not the owners of the disputed lands, but rather the Gram Panchayat concerned, is the admitted owner of the petition lands, thus being both valid and lawful."

The High Court extensively analyzed the legal status of the petitioners as tenants, referencing Annexures P-1 and P-2 from previous court proceedings, which had declared the petitioners as tenants over the disputed lands. Despite this, the court found that the Gram Panchayat retained the right to evict, as stated in the operative part of Annexure P-1, "The plaintiffs are in possession of the land as tenant and as such, the findings of the learned Trial Court on issue No.1, 2 and 3 are set aside and the issues are decided in favour of the plaintiffs."

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming the eviction orders dated 31.01.1995 (Annexure P-3) and 07.09.1995 (Annexure P-4). This decision clarifies the rights of Gram Panchayats in relation to land tenure and eviction processes, particularly when dealing with tenants who do not have ownership rights.

Date of Decision: 20 January  2024

Siri Ram And Others VS The Collector, District Faridabad And Others

 

Latest Legal News