Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Petitioners not Owners but Tenants: High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants by Gram Panchayat

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has upheld the eviction orders against petitioners who claimed to be 'Gair Marusi' tenants of land owned by the Gram Panchayat. The bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lalit Batra delivered the verdict on January 22, 2024, in the case of Siri Ram & Others vs. The Collector, District Faridabad & Others (CWP-7272-1996).

The petitioners challenged the concurrent verdicts of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector and the Appellate Authority, arguing that they held possession of the lands as 'Gair Marusi'. However, the court observed, "The petitioners, who are not the owners of the disputed lands, but rather the Gram Panchayat concerned, is the admitted owner of the petition lands, thus being both valid and lawful."

The High Court extensively analyzed the legal status of the petitioners as tenants, referencing Annexures P-1 and P-2 from previous court proceedings, which had declared the petitioners as tenants over the disputed lands. Despite this, the court found that the Gram Panchayat retained the right to evict, as stated in the operative part of Annexure P-1, "The plaintiffs are in possession of the land as tenant and as such, the findings of the learned Trial Court on issue No.1, 2 and 3 are set aside and the issues are decided in favour of the plaintiffs."

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming the eviction orders dated 31.01.1995 (Annexure P-3) and 07.09.1995 (Annexure P-4). This decision clarifies the rights of Gram Panchayats in relation to land tenure and eviction processes, particularly when dealing with tenants who do not have ownership rights.

Date of Decision: 20 January  2024

Siri Ram And Others VS The Collector, District Faridabad And Others

 

Latest Legal News