Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Petitioners not Owners but Tenants: High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants by Gram Panchayat

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has upheld the eviction orders against petitioners who claimed to be 'Gair Marusi' tenants of land owned by the Gram Panchayat. The bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lalit Batra delivered the verdict on January 22, 2024, in the case of Siri Ram & Others vs. The Collector, District Faridabad & Others (CWP-7272-1996).

The petitioners challenged the concurrent verdicts of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector and the Appellate Authority, arguing that they held possession of the lands as 'Gair Marusi'. However, the court observed, "The petitioners, who are not the owners of the disputed lands, but rather the Gram Panchayat concerned, is the admitted owner of the petition lands, thus being both valid and lawful."

The High Court extensively analyzed the legal status of the petitioners as tenants, referencing Annexures P-1 and P-2 from previous court proceedings, which had declared the petitioners as tenants over the disputed lands. Despite this, the court found that the Gram Panchayat retained the right to evict, as stated in the operative part of Annexure P-1, "The plaintiffs are in possession of the land as tenant and as such, the findings of the learned Trial Court on issue No.1, 2 and 3 are set aside and the issues are decided in favour of the plaintiffs."

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming the eviction orders dated 31.01.1995 (Annexure P-3) and 07.09.1995 (Annexure P-4). This decision clarifies the rights of Gram Panchayats in relation to land tenure and eviction processes, particularly when dealing with tenants who do not have ownership rights.

Date of Decision: 20 January  2024

Siri Ram And Others VS The Collector, District Faridabad And Others

 

Latest Legal News