Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

PCS(JB) Exam - Re-checking is Not Synonymous with Revaluation - Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Revaluation of Answer Sheets – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition that sought the revaluation of answer sheets for the PCS (JB) 2022 examination for the posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate. The Court clarified that "re-checking is not synonymous and equivalent to revaluation," quoting from its own observations in the judgement.

The petition raised questions regarding the timing of re-checking and whether it should be synonymous with revaluation. The Court, in its judgement, stated that Clause 11 of the advertisement dated 06.09.2022 allows only for re-checking, not revaluation. "Re-checking pertains to retotalling of marks and ensuring all questions have been marked, whereas revaluation involves reassessment of answers," the Court observed.

The Court also addressed the timing of re-checking, emphasizing the need to maintain the "sanctity and impartiality of the selection process." The judgement rejected the argument that re-checking should be allowed immediately after the main written examination and before the viva-voce.

Another key point in the judgement was the Court's stance on the disclosure of marks. The Court upheld the practice of not disclosing marks obtained in the written examination until the final result is declared. "Disclosure prior to viva-voce could lead to bias and is not in the interest of transparency," the Court noted.

The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments to assert that in the absence of any provision for revaluation in the Recruitment Rules, revaluation should not be directed. The judgement also cited Supreme Court views on the non-disclosure of marks before the viva-voce.

In its final decision, the Court found "no ground whatsoever which calls for interference" and dismissed the writ petition. The ruling is seen as setting a precedent for future cases involving the revaluation and re-checking of examination answer sheets.

The judgement was delivered by Judge Lisa Gill and Judge Ritu Tagore on September 28, 2023.                   Date of Decision: 28 September 2023 

Malwinder Singh and others vs Punjab Public Service Commission and others  

Latest Legal News