'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

PCS(JB) Exam - Re-checking is Not Synonymous with Revaluation - Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Revaluation of Answer Sheets – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition that sought the revaluation of answer sheets for the PCS (JB) 2022 examination for the posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate. The Court clarified that "re-checking is not synonymous and equivalent to revaluation," quoting from its own observations in the judgement.

The petition raised questions regarding the timing of re-checking and whether it should be synonymous with revaluation. The Court, in its judgement, stated that Clause 11 of the advertisement dated 06.09.2022 allows only for re-checking, not revaluation. "Re-checking pertains to retotalling of marks and ensuring all questions have been marked, whereas revaluation involves reassessment of answers," the Court observed.

The Court also addressed the timing of re-checking, emphasizing the need to maintain the "sanctity and impartiality of the selection process." The judgement rejected the argument that re-checking should be allowed immediately after the main written examination and before the viva-voce.

Another key point in the judgement was the Court's stance on the disclosure of marks. The Court upheld the practice of not disclosing marks obtained in the written examination until the final result is declared. "Disclosure prior to viva-voce could lead to bias and is not in the interest of transparency," the Court noted.

The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments to assert that in the absence of any provision for revaluation in the Recruitment Rules, revaluation should not be directed. The judgement also cited Supreme Court views on the non-disclosure of marks before the viva-voce.

In its final decision, the Court found "no ground whatsoever which calls for interference" and dismissed the writ petition. The ruling is seen as setting a precedent for future cases involving the revaluation and re-checking of examination answer sheets.

The judgement was delivered by Judge Lisa Gill and Judge Ritu Tagore on September 28, 2023.                   Date of Decision: 28 September 2023 

Malwinder Singh and others vs Punjab Public Service Commission and others  

Latest Legal News