Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

PCS(JB) Exam - Re-checking is Not Synonymous with Revaluation - Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Revaluation of Answer Sheets – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition that sought the revaluation of answer sheets for the PCS (JB) 2022 examination for the posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate. The Court clarified that "re-checking is not synonymous and equivalent to revaluation," quoting from its own observations in the judgement.

The petition raised questions regarding the timing of re-checking and whether it should be synonymous with revaluation. The Court, in its judgement, stated that Clause 11 of the advertisement dated 06.09.2022 allows only for re-checking, not revaluation. "Re-checking pertains to retotalling of marks and ensuring all questions have been marked, whereas revaluation involves reassessment of answers," the Court observed.

The Court also addressed the timing of re-checking, emphasizing the need to maintain the "sanctity and impartiality of the selection process." The judgement rejected the argument that re-checking should be allowed immediately after the main written examination and before the viva-voce.

Another key point in the judgement was the Court's stance on the disclosure of marks. The Court upheld the practice of not disclosing marks obtained in the written examination until the final result is declared. "Disclosure prior to viva-voce could lead to bias and is not in the interest of transparency," the Court noted.

The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments to assert that in the absence of any provision for revaluation in the Recruitment Rules, revaluation should not be directed. The judgement also cited Supreme Court views on the non-disclosure of marks before the viva-voce.

In its final decision, the Court found "no ground whatsoever which calls for interference" and dismissed the writ petition. The ruling is seen as setting a precedent for future cases involving the revaluation and re-checking of examination answer sheets.

The judgement was delivered by Judge Lisa Gill and Judge Ritu Tagore on September 28, 2023.                   Date of Decision: 28 September 2023 

Malwinder Singh and others vs Punjab Public Service Commission and others  

Latest Legal News