Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

PCS(JB) Exam - Re-checking is Not Synonymous with Revaluation - Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Revaluation of Answer Sheets – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition that sought the revaluation of answer sheets for the PCS (JB) 2022 examination for the posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate. The Court clarified that "re-checking is not synonymous and equivalent to revaluation," quoting from its own observations in the judgement.

The petition raised questions regarding the timing of re-checking and whether it should be synonymous with revaluation. The Court, in its judgement, stated that Clause 11 of the advertisement dated 06.09.2022 allows only for re-checking, not revaluation. "Re-checking pertains to retotalling of marks and ensuring all questions have been marked, whereas revaluation involves reassessment of answers," the Court observed.

The Court also addressed the timing of re-checking, emphasizing the need to maintain the "sanctity and impartiality of the selection process." The judgement rejected the argument that re-checking should be allowed immediately after the main written examination and before the viva-voce.

Another key point in the judgement was the Court's stance on the disclosure of marks. The Court upheld the practice of not disclosing marks obtained in the written examination until the final result is declared. "Disclosure prior to viva-voce could lead to bias and is not in the interest of transparency," the Court noted.

The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments to assert that in the absence of any provision for revaluation in the Recruitment Rules, revaluation should not be directed. The judgement also cited Supreme Court views on the non-disclosure of marks before the viva-voce.

In its final decision, the Court found "no ground whatsoever which calls for interference" and dismissed the writ petition. The ruling is seen as setting a precedent for future cases involving the revaluation and re-checking of examination answer sheets.

The judgement was delivered by Judge Lisa Gill and Judge Ritu Tagore on September 28, 2023.                   Date of Decision: 28 September 2023 

Malwinder Singh and others vs Punjab Public Service Commission and others  

Latest Legal News