Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

P&H HC Criticizes lower compensation awarded by Tribunal to injured claimant in motor accident case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On April 17, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivered its judgment in FAO No.1187 of 2019 (O&M) in a case filed by Jaswant Singh against Rachit Gulati and others. The appellant had challenged the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rupnagar, vide award dated October 29, 2018, after he was injured in a road accident in 2016.

The appellant had claimed that he was driving his motorcycle on the correct side of the road when a car driven by respondent No.1, in a rash and negligent manner, struck him while he had parked on the side of the road to drink water. The respondent denied the accident and the respondent No.3-Insurance Company filed a written statement denying the accident's factum.

The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.11,86,208 to the appellant under various heads. Aggrieved by the compensation awarded, the appellant filed an appeal, challenging the Tribunal's compensation amount.

During the pendency of the appeal, the claimant-appellant filed an application for permission to lead additional evidence. The additional evidence was a disability certificate issued by the Medical Board, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, showing the appellant's disability to be 51%.

The High Court heard the arguments of the appellant's counsel and the respondent No.3-Insurance Company's counsel and perused the evidence on record.

The High Court observed that the appellant had undergone eight surgeries and remained admitted in various hospitals for about a year. The Court also noted that the appellant's functional disability was assessed as 25%, and the appellant's vocation as a coaching centre operator was affected by the injury. Hence, an addition of 40% towards loss of future prospects, as per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pappu Deo Yadav vs. Naresh Kumar & Ors., was warranted.

The High Court enhanced the compensation amount and awarded Rs.35,48,608 to the appellant under various heads, including medical bills, future treatment, pain and suffering, loss of amenities of life, and attendant charges. The enhanced amount included future prospects of Rs.1,40,000, a multiplier of 17, and an amount of Rs.2,00,000 towards loss of amenities of life.

The High Court allowed the appeal, modifying the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, and directed the enhanced amount to attract interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.

Jaswant Singh VS  Rachit Gulati and others.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2.pdf"]

Latest Legal News