Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims

P&H HC  Grants Compensation to Widow of Deceased Soldier for Delayed Allotment of Land

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Court criticizes authorities for indolence and indifference towards honoring martyr's family

Chandigarh, May 4, 2023: In a significant judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has awarded compensation to the widow of a deceased soldier for the delayed allotment of land. The court expressed strong criticism towards the authorities for their indolence and indifference towards honoring the martyr's family.

The petitioner, Balwant Kaur, is the widow of late Havaldar Kehar Singh, who bravely laid down his life defending the borders of the country. In recognition of his gallantry, Balwant Kaur was allotted 10 acres of land in Ludhiana on August 8, 1997. However, she was only given symbolic possession of 8 acres, as the remaining 2 acres were covered by forest land.

Frustrated by the failure to assign her a revenue rasta (road) to access the allotted land, Balwant Kaur approached the High Court through a writ petition. Despite the court's directions and the intervention of the Director, Land Records, Punjab, no action was taken to address her grievances.

Taking note of the delay and the authorities' lack of promptness in addressing the issue, the court strongly criticized their indifference towards the widow of a martyr. The court emphasized that the valiant services of her late husband deserved utmost respect and prompt action.

As a compensatory measure, the court directed the State of Punjab to remit a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs into Balwant Kaur's savings bank account. The compensation aimed to acknowledge the unnecessary litigation she had to endure and the delays in granting her the rightful benefits.

decision:04.052023

BALWANT KAUR vs  STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/04-may-2023-Balwant-vs-State.pdf"]

Latest Legal News