CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Orders Obtained Through Fraud Deemed Nullities - High Court Restores Land in Favor of Petitioner

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, presided over by Hon’ble Alok Mathur, J., today delivered a significant judgment in a case involving fraudulent manipulation of revenue records. The Court, applying principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding fraud, declared orders obtained through fraud as nullities, restoring the contested land to the petitioner.

The writ petition challenged various orders related to the cancellation of patta (land grant) and mutation (land record alteration) of land. The petitioner, Ganga Prasad, contested that Ram Naresh, a Lekhpal (revenue officer), fraudulently manipulated land records, which led to a series of disputed orders.

Fraudulent Manipulation of Revenue Records: The Court found that Ram Naresh, while serving as Lekhpal, made unauthorized changes to the revenue records to include his name, replacing the petitioner’s. This action was deemed fraudulent, lacking any order from a competent authority.

Inquiry Reports and Evidence of Fraud: Investigations by the Chief Revenue Officer and Principal Secretary, Revenue, confirmed the unauthorized and fraudulent entries made by Ram Naresh.

Legal Heir Substitution and Will Dispute: The Court criticized the Additional Commissioner’s refusal to recognize the petitioner as a legal heir based on a registered will, noting the lack of a requirement for a court decree in such substitution applications.

Application of Supreme Court’s Principles on Fraud: The High Court echoed the Supreme Court’s view that fraud vitiates all judicial and administrative acts. Any order obtained through fraud is treated as a nullity.

Decision: The Court set aside the orders dated 21.06.2011, 16.07.2011, and 25.07.2011 by the Additional Commissioner, and orders dated 31.10.1996 and 04.08.1997 by the Prescribed Authority. The land was restored to Kishore, the petitioner’s predecessor, and his successors. A cost of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on respondents 5 and 6.

 Date of Decision: 22nd March 2024

Ganga Prasad vs. State of U.P. Through Secy. Finance and Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others

 

Latest Legal News