Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Orders Obtained Through Fraud Deemed Nullities - High Court Restores Land in Favor of Petitioner

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, presided over by Hon’ble Alok Mathur, J., today delivered a significant judgment in a case involving fraudulent manipulation of revenue records. The Court, applying principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding fraud, declared orders obtained through fraud as nullities, restoring the contested land to the petitioner.

The writ petition challenged various orders related to the cancellation of patta (land grant) and mutation (land record alteration) of land. The petitioner, Ganga Prasad, contested that Ram Naresh, a Lekhpal (revenue officer), fraudulently manipulated land records, which led to a series of disputed orders.

Fraudulent Manipulation of Revenue Records: The Court found that Ram Naresh, while serving as Lekhpal, made unauthorized changes to the revenue records to include his name, replacing the petitioner’s. This action was deemed fraudulent, lacking any order from a competent authority.

Inquiry Reports and Evidence of Fraud: Investigations by the Chief Revenue Officer and Principal Secretary, Revenue, confirmed the unauthorized and fraudulent entries made by Ram Naresh.

Legal Heir Substitution and Will Dispute: The Court criticized the Additional Commissioner’s refusal to recognize the petitioner as a legal heir based on a registered will, noting the lack of a requirement for a court decree in such substitution applications.

Application of Supreme Court’s Principles on Fraud: The High Court echoed the Supreme Court’s view that fraud vitiates all judicial and administrative acts. Any order obtained through fraud is treated as a nullity.

Decision: The Court set aside the orders dated 21.06.2011, 16.07.2011, and 25.07.2011 by the Additional Commissioner, and orders dated 31.10.1996 and 04.08.1997 by the Prescribed Authority. The land was restored to Kishore, the petitioner’s predecessor, and his successors. A cost of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on respondents 5 and 6.

 Date of Decision: 22nd March 2024

Ganga Prasad vs. State of U.P. Through Secy. Finance and Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others

 

Latest Legal News