High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Once Issues Have Been Framed, the Court Must Address All Issues: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Suit on Misuser Charges

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling today, overturned a previous judgment dismissing the suit filed by Atma Ram Properties Pvt Ltd against the Union of India & ANR regarding misuser charges on a leased property. The Bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, pointedly stated that “no pleadings with regard to the non-applicability of the misuser charges” had been properly considered, leading to the restoration of the suit for comprehensive retrial.

Legal Background: The appeal was centered on the judicial evaluation of misuser charges and damages alleged by the Land and Development Office (L&DO) against the appellant for the lease of Scindia House, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. The dispute primarily revolved around whether these charges were imposed fairly and in accordance with the law.

Facts and Issues Arising: After acquiring the property from the erstwhile owners, Atma Ram Properties was subjected to substantial misuser charges by L&DO, which they claimed were unjust and not in line with existing regulations. Initially, the property’s issues were dismissed by a single judge, leading to this appeal.

Evaluation of Misuser Charges: The court scrutinized the foundational basis of the misuser charges, questioning both their legitimacy and the process by which they were imposed.

Adequacy of Pleadings and Evidence: The appellate court criticized the previous judgment for its failure to adequately address comprehensive pleadings presented during the trial, which included claims of payments made under duress.

Direction for Retrial: Emphasizing the need for a thorough re-evaluation, the High Court mandated a retrial of the case, underscoring the necessity to address all issues originally framed during the suit.

Decision: With the appellate judgment, the Delhi High Court has set aside the prior dismissal of the suit and reinstated it, directing that it be tried afresh with all due considerations. This development marks a pivotal turn in the legal proceedings concerning the leasehold disputes over Scindia House.

Scheduled Hearing: The restored suit is set to be reheard before the Roster Bench on May 21, 2024.

Date of Decision: April 29, 2024

ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PVT LTD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR

Similar News