Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

"Obligation to Pay Rent Remained Unfulfilled": Kerala High Court Upholds Tenant's Eviction

05 September 2024 5:21 AM

By: Admin


Ernakulam, 12 September 2023 - The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, in a landmark judgment, upheld the eviction of a tenant, Subeesh, for failing to pay the outstanding rent within the stipulated time. The two-judge bench, comprising Justice P.B. Suresh Kumar and Justice P.G. Ajithkumar, stated that the tenant's "obligation to pay the rent then in arrears before 21.03.2020 remained unfulfilled."

Subeesh, the petitioner, had been directed by the Rent Control Court in North Paravur to vacate the rented premises and surrender it to the landlord, Vichathran, due to unpaid arrears. Subeesh had appealed the decision, but the Rent Control Appellate Authority affirmed the lower court's ruling.

"The object of the provisions of Section 12(1) of the Act is to deny the defaulting tenant the right to contest the application for eviction," Justice P.G. Ajithkumar observed, underlining that the obligation to pay rent is not merely dependent on court orders but is statutory.

In a detailed order, the court also cited previous decisions, highlighting that "the principles of natural justice would mandate that the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority should afford such an opportunity to the tenant before passing an order under Section 12(3)."

Despite multiple opportunities and court orders, Subeesh failed to pay the complete arrears by the specified deadline. Even after being granted additional time by the court, Subeesh paid only a portion of the due amount, thus "failing to fulfill his statutory obligations."

Upholding the decision of the lower courts, the High Court stated, "His obligation to pay the rent then in arrears before 21.03.2020 as per the judgment in O.P.(RC) No.28 of 2020 remained unfulfilled." With this, the Court effectively sealed the tenant's fate, affirming his eviction.

The case serves as a stern reminder to tenants about the legal repercussions of not adhering to rent agreements and court orders.

Date of Decision: 12 September 2023

SUBEESH vs VICHATHRAN

Latest Legal News