CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

NURSING ASSISTANTS NOT ENTITLED TO SAME ALLOWANCE AS STAFF NURSES BASED ON EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: SUPREME COURT

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that Nursing Assistants cannot claim the same Nursing Allowance as Staff Nurses based on their educational qualifications. The decision came in the case of Union of India & Ors. v. Rajib Khan & Ors., where the Court quashed the judgment of the High Court of Gauhati, which had allowed the original writ petitioners to receive Nursing Allowance at par with Staff Nurses.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising of Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, observed that the educational qualifications and duties of Nursing Assistants differ from those of Staff Nurses. The Court emphasized that Nursing Assistants lack the relevant experience and educational qualifications required for appointment as Staff Nurses. Consequently, the Court concluded that Nursing Assistants cannot be equated with Staff Nurses in terms of entitlement to the same Nursing Allowance.

The Court highlighted the High Court's error in holding that educational qualifications should not be a ground for denial of Nursing Allowance to Nursing Assistants. It referred to earlier judgments, including Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited v. Balbir Kumar Walia and others, where it was held that different educational qualifications and experience can justify distinct pay scales or pay structures.

The Supreme Court's decision clarifies that the classification of Nursing Assistants and Staff Nurses for the purpose of allowances is based on their differing educational qualifications and duties. It further reinforces the principle that the determination of pay structure falls within the purview of the Executive and cannot be overturned by the judiciary.

The ruling will have implications for the healthcare sector and the remuneration of healthcare professionals. It underscores the importance of recognizing the variances in educational qualifications and experience when determining entitlement to allowances in similar job roles.

The Supreme Court's judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving different pay scales or allowances based on educational qualifications, experience, and the nature of duties in various sectors. It establishes the principle that equality in pay does not necessarily mean identical treatment for employees with distinct qualifications and responsibilities.

The decision serves as a reminder that the classification of pay scales should be based on objective criteria and reasonable differentiations. It also emphasizes the significance of considering the qualifications and experience required for specific roles while determining entitlements to financial benefits within an organization.

This landmark judgment will provide clarity and guidance to employers, employees, and the legal fraternity regarding the determination of pay structures and allowances based on educational qualifications and job responsibilities in India's workforce.

Date of Decision: January 16, 2023

The Union of India & Ors.   vs Rajib Khan & Ors.               

 

Latest Legal News