TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Notices under Section 153C of Income Tax Act Unwarranted Without Specific Incriminating Material For Assessment Years: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed numerous notices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that such notices are untenable in the absence of specific incriminating material directly relating to the assessment years for which reopening was sought. The Court emphasized that a generic invocation of Section 153C for an entire block of ten years, without specific material linked to each year, is legally impermissible.

The judgment focused on the critical requirement for the existence of specific incriminating material directly relating to the assessment years in question to invoke Section 153C. It distinguished the provisions of Section 153A and 153C, noting that while Section 153A mandates issuance of notice post-search for six preceding years leading to abatement of pending assessments, Section 153C necessitates satisfaction regarding the impact of discovered material on total income determination before initiating proceedings.

The batch of writ petitions challenged notices issued under Section 153C for various Assessment Years (AYs), deeming them illegal due to the absence of specific incriminating material for the AYs proposed to be reopened.

Interpretation of Section 153C: The Court held that Section 153C necessitates a satisfaction that material found during search influences total income for specific AYs. Generic invocation for an entire block of ten years without specific material related to each year is impermissible.

Distinguishing Sections 153A and 153C: The procedural mandates and preconditions between these two sections are distinct. Section 153A involves automatic issuance of notice post-search for six preceding years, whereas Section 153C requires specific satisfaction of the impact of discovered material.

Application and Impact of Satisfaction Notes: The necessity for specificity in satisfaction notes was underscored. They must record reasons how material discovered during search influences total income for particular AYs.

The Court quashed the majority of impugned notices under Section 153C due to lack of specific incriminating material linked to the assessment years in question. Exceptions were made in two cases where satisfaction notes adequately specified relevant AYs.

Date of the decision is April 09, 2024.

Saksham Commodities Limited Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 22(1), Delhi & Anr.", and the

Latest Legal News