Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Notices under Section 153C of Income Tax Act Unwarranted Without Specific Incriminating Material For Assessment Years: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed numerous notices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that such notices are untenable in the absence of specific incriminating material directly relating to the assessment years for which reopening was sought. The Court emphasized that a generic invocation of Section 153C for an entire block of ten years, without specific material linked to each year, is legally impermissible.

The judgment focused on the critical requirement for the existence of specific incriminating material directly relating to the assessment years in question to invoke Section 153C. It distinguished the provisions of Section 153A and 153C, noting that while Section 153A mandates issuance of notice post-search for six preceding years leading to abatement of pending assessments, Section 153C necessitates satisfaction regarding the impact of discovered material on total income determination before initiating proceedings.

The batch of writ petitions challenged notices issued under Section 153C for various Assessment Years (AYs), deeming them illegal due to the absence of specific incriminating material for the AYs proposed to be reopened.

Interpretation of Section 153C: The Court held that Section 153C necessitates a satisfaction that material found during search influences total income for specific AYs. Generic invocation for an entire block of ten years without specific material related to each year is impermissible.

Distinguishing Sections 153A and 153C: The procedural mandates and preconditions between these two sections are distinct. Section 153A involves automatic issuance of notice post-search for six preceding years, whereas Section 153C requires specific satisfaction of the impact of discovered material.

Application and Impact of Satisfaction Notes: The necessity for specificity in satisfaction notes was underscored. They must record reasons how material discovered during search influences total income for particular AYs.

The Court quashed the majority of impugned notices under Section 153C due to lack of specific incriminating material linked to the assessment years in question. Exceptions were made in two cases where satisfaction notes adequately specified relevant AYs.

Date of the decision is April 09, 2024.

Saksham Commodities Limited Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 22(1), Delhi & Anr.", and the

Latest Legal News