Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Non-Provision of Statutory Benefits to Students is Arbitrary and Violates Fundamental Rights: Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Action

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Delhi High Court emphatically stated that “fundamental rights cannot be trampled upon,” mandating immediate action to provide educational materials in kind, rather than cash, to students in GNCTD and MCD-run schools.

Legal Context: The court addressed systemic failures under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act), and other relevant statutes, focusing on the non-provision of uniforms, textbooks, and other educational necessities, which it deemed a violation of Article 21-A of the Constitution.

Facts and Issues: The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighted that over 650,000 students were being deprived of statutory educational benefits due to bureaucratic inertia and administrative inefficiencies within the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD). Notably, many students lacked bank accounts, a prerequisite for the cash transfer method currently employed.

Administrative Shortcomings: The Court pointed out the lack of coordination and operational standing committees within the MCD, contributing to the failure to provide materials directly to students.

Violation of Statutory Obligations: It was emphasized that the GNCTD and MCD’s approach breached statutory obligations by failing to distribute educational materials directly, as mandated under the RTE Act.

Need for Immediate Rectification: The Court criticized the ongoing administrative delays and emphasized the necessity of immediate action, given the upcoming academic breaks, underscoring the urgency of fulfilling constitutional and statutory obligations.

Decision: The High Court directed the immediate delegation of financial powers to the MCD Commissioner to resolve procurement issues and criticized the administrative inertia that led to repeated failures. The GNCTD and MCD are to ensure that educational materials are provided directly to students forthwith, without waiting for bureaucratic processes that delay the fulfillment of these fundamental rights.

Date of Decision: April 29, 2024

Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors

 

Latest Legal News