When Police Search Both The Bag And The Body, Section 50 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed: Supreme Court Settles The Boundaries Of A Critical Safeguard Police Cannot Offer A Third Option During NDPS Search: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In 11 Kg Charas Case, Holds Section 50 Violation Vitiates Entire Trial Supreme Court Holds Employer Group Insurance Has No Connection With Accidental Death, Cannot Be Set Off Against Motor Accident Compensation Graduating Shouldn't Be A Punishment: Supreme Court Restores Rights Of Anganwadi Workers Denied Supervisor Posts For Being Over-Qualified Trustee Who Diverts Sale Proceeds of Charitable Trust Is an 'Agent' Under Section 409 IPC, Not Exempt From Criminal Breach of Trust: Bombay High Court AFGIS Is 'State' Under Article 12: Supreme Court Reverses Delhi High Court, Restores Writ Petitions of Air Force Insurance Society Employees Delhi High Court Issues Landmark Directions Against Repeated Summoning of Child Victims, Insistence on Presence During Bail Hearings In POCSO 'Accidental Injury' in Hospital Records, All Eye-Witnesses Hostile: Gujarat High Court Acquits Men Convicted for Culpable Homicide After 35 Years Medical Condition Alone Cannot Dilute the Statutory Embargo Under Section 37 NDPS Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Pre-emption Cannot Wait for Registration When Possession Has Already Changed Hands: Punjab & Haryana High Court Strikes Down Time-Barred Claim Listing a Case for Evidence Is Not Commencement of Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Insurance Dispute Forgery Accused Cannot Be Declared 'Proclaimed Offender': Punjab and Haryana High Court Draws Critical Distinction Between 'Proclaimed Person' and 'Proclaimed Offender' A Two-Line Ex Parte Judgment Is No Judgment In The Eye Of Law: Madras High Court Declares Decree Inexecutable What Was Not Claimed Then Cannot Be Claimed Now: Calcutta High Court Applies Constructive Res Judicata to Bar Second Partition Suit Unregistered Family Settlement Creates No Rights in Immovable Property: Delhi High Court Rejects Brother's Ownership Claim Police Must Protect Lawful Possession When Civil Court Decree Is Defied: Kerala High Court Upholds Purchase Certificate Holder’s Rights Over Alleged Temple Claim One Mark Short, No Right to Appointment: Patna High Court Dismisses Engineer's Claim to Vacancies Left by Non-Joining Candidates Bombay High Court Binds MCA to Arbitration as "Veritable Party" in T20 League Dispute Silence in the Witness Box Can Sink Your Case: ‘Non-Examination Leads to Presumption Against Party’ — Andhra Pradesh High Court Sale Deed Holder With Registered Title Prevails Over Claimant Under Mere Agreement To Sell: Karnataka High Court Candidate With 'Third Child' Disqualification Cannot Escape Consequence By Avoiding Cross-Examination: Supreme Court

Non-Provision of Statutory Benefits to Students is Arbitrary and Violates Fundamental Rights: Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Action

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Delhi High Court emphatically stated that “fundamental rights cannot be trampled upon,” mandating immediate action to provide educational materials in kind, rather than cash, to students in GNCTD and MCD-run schools.

Legal Context: The court addressed systemic failures under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act), and other relevant statutes, focusing on the non-provision of uniforms, textbooks, and other educational necessities, which it deemed a violation of Article 21-A of the Constitution.

Facts and Issues: The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighted that over 650,000 students were being deprived of statutory educational benefits due to bureaucratic inertia and administrative inefficiencies within the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD). Notably, many students lacked bank accounts, a prerequisite for the cash transfer method currently employed.

Administrative Shortcomings: The Court pointed out the lack of coordination and operational standing committees within the MCD, contributing to the failure to provide materials directly to students.

Violation of Statutory Obligations: It was emphasized that the GNCTD and MCD’s approach breached statutory obligations by failing to distribute educational materials directly, as mandated under the RTE Act.

Need for Immediate Rectification: The Court criticized the ongoing administrative delays and emphasized the necessity of immediate action, given the upcoming academic breaks, underscoring the urgency of fulfilling constitutional and statutory obligations.

Decision: The High Court directed the immediate delegation of financial powers to the MCD Commissioner to resolve procurement issues and criticized the administrative inertia that led to repeated failures. The GNCTD and MCD are to ensure that educational materials are provided directly to students forthwith, without waiting for bureaucratic processes that delay the fulfillment of these fundamental rights.

Date of Decision: April 29, 2024

Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors

 

Latest Legal News