Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld

Non-Compliance with Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. Gives Rise to Many Legal Issues in Court: Supreme Court in Dablu Kujur's Bail Denial

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a critical observation today, the Supreme Court, while refusing bail to Dablu Kujur, underscored the significant legal complications arising from non-compliance with Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. in police reports. The verdict was pronounced by Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mithal. [Para 7, 12-16]

The Court focused on the mandatory adherence to procedural norms in the submission of police reports, highlighting its crucial role in the judicial process. The judgment detailed the obligations of Investigating Officers in preparing comprehensive reports as per the directed guidelines. [Para 7, 12-16]

The issue at hand was the bail appeal of Dablu Kujur, accused under the IPC and Arms Act. The Supreme Court noted the advanced stage of the trial, with most witnesses already examined, influencing its decision to deny bail. [Para 2-4]

Justice Trivedi provided specific instructions for police reports, covering details of the accused, the offence, arrest and custody status, especially in cases involving sexual offences. The Court’s directives aimed at ensuring the thoroughness and legality of police reports. [Para 17-18]

A notable directive was issued to State and High Court authorities to ensure compliance with these guidelines, emphasizing the importance of procedural accuracy in the criminal justice system. [Para 19]

The Supreme Court's dismissal of Kujur's bail plea, adhering to the High Court's decision, reinforced the essentiality of strict compliance with legal procedures in police reporting. [Para 19]

Date of Decision: March 12, 2024

Dablu Kujur vs The State of Jharkhand

Similar News