Confiscation Of Vehicle Under Section 49 Assam Forest Regulation Is Only Temporary; Final Confiscation Requires Conviction Under Section 51: Gauhati High Court Amendment Of Written Statement Cannot Be Allowed After Trial Commences If Facts Were Within Party's Knowledge: Delhi High Court Section 149 IPC Cannot Be Invoked If Number Of Convicted Persons Falls Below Five After Acquittal Of Co-Accused: Allahabad High Court Requirement Of 'Clear Seven Days' Notice For No-Confidence Motion Under West Bengal Panchayat Act Is Procedural, Not Mandatory: Calcutta High Court Cooperative Society’s General Body Cannot Ratify Appointment Made In Violation Of Statutory Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registered Will Executed In Hospital Carries Presumption Of Genuineness; Illness Doesn't Equal Unsound Mind: Delhi High Court Exacting Work From Teachers Without Paying Salary Amounts To 'Begar', Violates Article 23: Bombay High Court General & Omnibus Charge Sheet Lacking Individual Roles Of Accused In Matrimonial Case Is Abuse Of Process: Calcutta High Court Admission Of Claim By IRP Not An 'Acknowledgment Of Liability' Under Section 18 Limitation Act To Extend Limitation: Supreme Court Special Appeal Against Order Refusing To Initiate Contempt Proceedings Not Maintainable If Merits Of Original Case Not Decided: Allahabad High Court Prior Sanction Not Required For Magistrate To Direct FIR Registration Under Section 156(3) CrPC; It Is A Pre-Cognizance Stage: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Create Or Expand Criminal Offences In Absence Of Legislative Action: Supreme Court Rejects Plea For Specific Hate Speech Law State Cannot Reopen Regularisation Issues That Attained Finality; ISRO Must Grant Permanent Status To Daily-Wagers: Supreme Court Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration Of Title Must Succeed On Strength Of Own Title, Not Weakness Of Defendant’s Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court Interest Of Justice Demands Child Of Tender Age Remains In Mother's Custody: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment Debtors Cannot Approbate And Reprobate; Must Adhere To Agreed Valuation In Compromise Decree: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Act As Appellate Court Under Article 227 Supervisory Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores NICE Project Land Valuation Material Omissions In Section 161 Statements Cannot Be Cured By Improvements During Trial: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Courts Must Guard Against Roping In All Family Members Without Specific Evidence Of Individual Roles: Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Pawan Khera In Forgery Case, Says Allegations Prima Facie Appear Politically Motivated

No Suspension without Notice or Hearing: Supreme Court Upholds Natural Justice in PC&PNDT Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, on March 4th, 2024, affirmed the principles of natural justice in the context of suspension and cancellation of registration under the Preconception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PC&PNDT) Act, 1994. The Bench, comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan, held that suspending the registration of medical facilities requires adherence to natural justice, including issuing a show cause notice and providing an opportunity of hearing.

The legal issue at the heart of the appeal was the interpretation of the powers under Section 20(1), (2), and (3) of the PC&PNDT Act concerning the suspension and cancellation of registration of medical facilities. The case specifically dealt with the suspension of "Dev Hospital," Ahmedabad, which was done without issuing notice or a hearing, prompting a legal challenge on the grounds of procedural impropriety.

The case originated from a complaint leading to the inspection of Dev Hospital and the subsequent suspension of its registration under the PC&PNDT Act. The order of suspension, dated October 25, 2010, was issued without prior notice or a hearing, a decision later challenged in the Gujarat High Court. The High Court set aside the suspension orders, leading to the present appeal in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court extensively analyzed the provisions of Section 20 of the PC&PNDT Act. It distinguished between the powers under Sections 20(1) & (2) and the distinct power under Section 20(3), which allows suspension in the public interest. The Court emphasized that this power should be exercised sparingly, for interim periods, and requires explicit reasoning demonstrating necessity in public interest. The Court observed, “The power of suspension...should be for interim period and not for an inordinate duration,” underscoring the temporary nature of such actions.

Upholding the Gujarat High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the District Appropriate Authority under the PC&PNDT Act. The Court agreed that the suspension orders were procedurally flawed and violated principles of natural justice. It noted that since the hospital is operational, no further orders were necessary to revive the registration.

Date of Decision: March 4, 2024

District Appropriate Authority under the PNDT Act and Chief District Health Officer v. Jashmina Dilip Devda & Anr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/04-Mar-2024-Auth-PNDT-Act-Vs-Jashmina-Civil.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News