Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

No Suspension without Notice or Hearing: Supreme Court Upholds Natural Justice in PC&PNDT Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, on March 4th, 2024, affirmed the principles of natural justice in the context of suspension and cancellation of registration under the Preconception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PC&PNDT) Act, 1994. The Bench, comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan, held that suspending the registration of medical facilities requires adherence to natural justice, including issuing a show cause notice and providing an opportunity of hearing.

The legal issue at the heart of the appeal was the interpretation of the powers under Section 20(1), (2), and (3) of the PC&PNDT Act concerning the suspension and cancellation of registration of medical facilities. The case specifically dealt with the suspension of "Dev Hospital," Ahmedabad, which was done without issuing notice or a hearing, prompting a legal challenge on the grounds of procedural impropriety.

The case originated from a complaint leading to the inspection of Dev Hospital and the subsequent suspension of its registration under the PC&PNDT Act. The order of suspension, dated October 25, 2010, was issued without prior notice or a hearing, a decision later challenged in the Gujarat High Court. The High Court set aside the suspension orders, leading to the present appeal in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court extensively analyzed the provisions of Section 20 of the PC&PNDT Act. It distinguished between the powers under Sections 20(1) & (2) and the distinct power under Section 20(3), which allows suspension in the public interest. The Court emphasized that this power should be exercised sparingly, for interim periods, and requires explicit reasoning demonstrating necessity in public interest. The Court observed, “The power of suspension...should be for interim period and not for an inordinate duration,” underscoring the temporary nature of such actions.

Upholding the Gujarat High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the District Appropriate Authority under the PC&PNDT Act. The Court agreed that the suspension orders were procedurally flawed and violated principles of natural justice. It noted that since the hospital is operational, no further orders were necessary to revive the registration.

Date of Decision: March 4, 2024

District Appropriate Authority under the PNDT Act and Chief District Health Officer v. Jashmina Dilip Devda & Anr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/04-Mar-2024-Auth-PNDT-Act-Vs-Jashmina-Civil.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News