MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

"No Room for Laxity in Admission Deadlines," Rules Punjab and Haryana High Court in Nursing College Case

29 August 2024 2:12 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a significant ruling on August 22, 2024, dismissed the petitions filed by New Malwa Educational Welfare Society and Malwa Educational Society. The petitions sought an extension of the deadline for submitting documents and fees for nursing course admissions, alleging a technical snag as the reason for their delay. The Court, upholding the strict adherence to the admission timeline set by the Punjab Nurses Registration Council (PNRC), emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of the admission process.

Two nursing colleges—New Malwa Institute of Nursing and Dr. Ravinder Institute of Nursing, along with Malwa College of Nursing—filed writ petitions challenging the refusal of the PNRC to accept their late submissions for the 2023-24 academic session. The colleges claimed that due to a technical glitch, they were unable to upload necessary documents and complete fee payments by the deadline of November 30, 2023. They sought a writ of mandamus to compel the PNRC to allow them to complete the admission process.

The Court underscored the critical importance of adhering to deadlines in the admission process, noting that the PNRC’s schedule must be strictly followed to ensure fairness and transparency. The Court observed that the admission process timeline, which was available from October 26, 2023, to November 30, 2023, did not encounter any reported technical issues affecting other institutions.

The Court was not persuaded by the petitioners' claims of a technical snag. It highlighted that over 30,000 students had successfully completed their admissions through the PNRC portal during the same period, and no other institutions reported similar difficulties. The Court further pointed out that the petitioners failed to provide timely evidence or inform the PNRC of any technical issues before the deadline passed.

The Court reasoned that allowing exceptions for the petitioners would undermine the sanctity of the established admission process, which requires strict compliance with deadlines. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court's stance in the St. Stephens Hospital College of Nursing case, which reinforced the necessity of adhering to the timelines set by regulatory bodies like the Indian Nursing Council.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's dismissal of the petitions reaffirms the judiciary's commitment to upholding the procedural integrity of the admission process in educational institutions. The ruling serves as a reminder of the critical importance of complying with established schedules and protocols, ensuring a level playing field for all applicants. The decision is expected to set a precedent, reinforcing strict adherence to admission timelines in future cases.

Date of Decision: August 22, 2024

New Malwa Educational Welfare Society vs. Punjab Nurses Registration Council and Another

Latest Legal News