Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

No Room for Dual Property Values in Specific Performance Cases: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal ruling, the Delhi High Court has issued an order emphasizing the clarity and uniformity required in determining property values in specific performance cases. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Justice Vibhu Bakhru, pertains to a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 22.12.1970, involving a property measuring 5373 sq. Yds. In Civil Lines, Delhi.

The High Court’s verdict, which serves as a legal precedent, revolves around the central issue of fixing the market value of the said property as of 03.12.2012, as directed by the Supreme Court. The judgment categorically rejects the notion of having two separate property values, one at ₹130 crores and another at ₹75 crores, and underscores the need for a single, well-determined market value.

Justice Bakhru’s observations highlight the Court’s commitment to upholding the integrity of specific performance cases and ensuring that parties involved adhere to the decrees set forth by the Supreme Court. He states, “The approach of putting in place two separate sale considerations for the suit property...is wholly alien to the scope of determination of the market value of the suit property...Clearly, there cannot be two market values of the same property for specific performance of the agreement to sell.”

The judgment further underscores that while property values may have some subjectivity, it is entirely within the Court’s purview to determine a property’s value based on the evidence and material presented during proceedings. “It is well settled that the price agreeable by a willing buyer and a willing seller would, in normal circumstances, be accepted as the value of a property,” notes the Court.

Furthermore, the judgment takes issue with the notion that property prices have declined since 2012, as there was no concrete evidence to support this claim. The Court emphasizes the importance of considering all relevant factors when determining property values.

Delhi High Court’s ruling sets a clear precedent, emphasizing the need for a single, well-established property value in specific performance cases, thus ensuring fairness and transparency in such legal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 05.12.2023

NARENDER JAIN & ANR Versus ANIS AHMED RUSHDIE (DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS

Latest Legal News