MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

NO PREMEDITATION ON THE PART OF THE APPELLANT TO COMMIT MURDER - CONVICTED FOR CULPABLE HOMOCIDE - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reduced the sentence of an appellant convicted under Sections 304(ii) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court, led by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, upheld the appellant's acquittal for the offense under Section 302 of the IPC. Citing the absence of premeditation and undue advantage, the court decided to reduce the sentence imposed on the appellant.

The appellant and the deceased were involved in a fight, with the court finding no evidence of premeditation or cruelty in the appellant's actions. The judgment states, "The fight had occurred between appellant and the deceased on the spot and there was no premeditation on the part of the appellant to commit murder of the deceased." Considering these findings, the court determined that the interest of justice would be best served by reducing the appellant's sentence.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court ordered the appellant to undergo five years of rigorous imprisonment for the offense under Section 304(ii) of the IPC. The remaining portion of the sentence imposed by the lower courts remained unchanged. The decision was delivered on 21st March 2023 and marks a significant development in the criminal appeal.

Date of Decision: 21.03.2023

PANNEER SELVAM vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Latest Legal News