POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court

NO PREMEDITATION ON THE PART OF THE APPELLANT TO COMMIT MURDER - CONVICTED FOR CULPABLE HOMOCIDE - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reduced the sentence of an appellant convicted under Sections 304(ii) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court, led by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, upheld the appellant's acquittal for the offense under Section 302 of the IPC. Citing the absence of premeditation and undue advantage, the court decided to reduce the sentence imposed on the appellant.

The appellant and the deceased were involved in a fight, with the court finding no evidence of premeditation or cruelty in the appellant's actions. The judgment states, "The fight had occurred between appellant and the deceased on the spot and there was no premeditation on the part of the appellant to commit murder of the deceased." Considering these findings, the court determined that the interest of justice would be best served by reducing the appellant's sentence.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court ordered the appellant to undergo five years of rigorous imprisonment for the offense under Section 304(ii) of the IPC. The remaining portion of the sentence imposed by the lower courts remained unchanged. The decision was delivered on 21st March 2023 and marks a significant development in the criminal appeal.

Date of Decision: 21.03.2023

PANNEER SELVAM vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Latest Legal News