Industrial Units In MIDC Areas Exempt From Municipal Property Tax Only As Long As MIDC Provides Amenities: Supreme Court MIDC Service Charges Are Fees For Services, Not Taxes; Industrial Units Must Pay Municipal Property Tax: Supreme Court Public Servants Have No Vested Right To Be Considered For Promotion Under Repealed Rules: Supreme Court IBC | Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Renege From Approved Plan By Citing Pending Litigations Or Letter Of Intent Conditions: Supreme Court Payment Of 93% Sale Consideration Demonstrates Readiness & Willingness For Specific Performance: Supreme Court Delay In Issuing Legal Notice No Ground To Deny Specific Performance If Suit Filed Within Limitation: Supreme Court Brandishing Pistol At Children During Abduction Inherently Constitutes Threat To Cause Death Or Hurt: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Lack Of CDR Records For 2003-Era Kidnapping Not Fatal To Prosecution If Oral Evidence Of Ransom Is Cogent: Supreme Court Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage On Ground Of Irretrievable Breakdown Under Article 142 Despite Wife's Opposition To Decree Failure To Conduct TIP For Unknown Accused Diminishes Evidentiary Value Of Dock Identification: Supreme Court Acquits Rape-Murder Convicts On Death Row Padded Evidence Created By Investigating Agency To Bolster Prosecution Case Fatal To Conviction In Circumstantial Evidence Cases: Supreme Court CCI Has No Inherent Power To Keep Combination Approval In Abeyance Or Order Re-Notification Without Express Statutory Authority: Supreme Court CCI Cannot Reopen Concluded Merger Approvals After One Year; Characterization Dispute In Filing Is Not 'Non-Disclosure': Supreme Court Sets Aside Orders Against Amazon Stamping Defects Are Curable, Arbitrators Empowered To Decide Such Objections Under Section 16 A&C Act: Supreme Court Rejection Of Section 16 Objection By Arbitrator Cannot Be Challenged Under Article 226/227; Aggrieved Party Must Wait For Final Award: Supreme Court Police Parading Accused Or Orchestrating Social Media Condemnation Is Extra-Legal Punishment, Violates Article 21: Rajasthan High Court Inclusion Of Hash Value In Electronic Record Certificates Is Essential For Data Integrity; Not Arbitrary: Supreme Court Judiciary Not Above Criticism; Portraying Imaginary Corrupt Court In Films Doesn't Scandalize Real Courts: Madras High Court

No Power with Grampanchayat to Stop Mobile Tower Work After NOC Issuance - Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court declared on 20th July 2023, that a Grampanchayat, after having issued a No Objection Certificate (NOC), has no authority to then pass a resolution instructing the cessation of mobile tower construction.

The case, involving Indus Towers Ltd., Pune (Formerly, Bharti Infratel Ltd., Pune) and the Grampanchayat of Chikhalhol, Tal. Khanapur, Dist. Sangli, revolved around the legality of a resolution that had halted the erection of a mobile tower due to health concerns raised by local villagers.

“The role of the Grampanchayat in the matter of erection of mobile tower in the vicinity of the Grampanchayat... is confined to only issuing of No Objection Certificate in terms of the Government Resolution dated 11th December 2015,” noted Justices SUNIL B. SHUKRE and RAJESH S. PATIL, stating that once an NOC has been issued, the Grampanchayat “loses control over the subject of erection of mobile tower.”

The court also considered the villagers’ apprehensions about potential harmful effects of the tower’s radiation, but found these to be unfounded, citing a lack of reliable scientific evidence. They quoted a past ruling, “jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be exercised on the basis of apprehensions, which are not rooted in facts and which are not supported by reliable scientific material.”

Consequently, the court quashed the Grampanchayat’s resolution and directed them not to obstruct the operation of the mobile tower as long as it is in accordance with the law. The ruling has important implications for the telecommunication infrastructure, affirming that after issuing an NOC, Grampanchayats cannot halt the installation of mobile towers based on non-scientific apprehensions.

Date of Decision:20th July, 2023

Indus Towers Ltd., Pune (Formerly, Bharti Infratel Ltd., Pune)  vs Grampanchayat,

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Indus_Vs_Grampanchyat_20July23_PHHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News