Even a Trespasser in Settled Possession Cannot Be Dispossessed Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes in Family Property Dispute Taxation Law | Issuance of Notices Without Application of Mind Violates Fundamental Principles: PH High Court Quashes Notices A Soldier Cannot Be Denied Disability Pension Just Because It Was Below 20%: Supreme Court Grants Full Benefits to Army Veteran Invalided Out for Seizure Disorder State Cannot Let Bureaucratic Delay Decide a Judge’s Seniority: Supreme Court Grants Retrospective Seniority to Civil Judges Selected in 2003 Prosecution Cannot Hijack Court’s Power to Frame Charges Under Section 216 CrPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Alteration of Charges in Double Murder Trial Primacy of Judiciary, Not Executive Discretion, Must Guide Prosecutor Appointments: Kerala High Court Declares District Judge’s Role Paramount Under BNSS Civil Wrongs Cannot Be Criminalized: Domain Dispute Not Forgery or Cheating: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Ex-Chancellor of Alliance University Conversations, Not Conspiracies - CDRs and Mere Conversations Cannot Prove Criminal Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Quashes CBI Case Against Prakash Industries CMD and Others Law Protects Against Real Cruelty, Not Every Family Argument — Police Machinery Isn’t a Weapon for Personal Vengeance: Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes FIR A Party Cannot Blow Hot and Cold – Once a Landlord Supports Tenancy Claim, Their Successors Cannot Turn Around: Gujarat High Court Upholds Tenant Rights Despite Revenue Tribunal’s Reversal Specific Performance Is a Discretion, Not a Right: Telangana High Court Trashes Fabricated Sale Agreement, Overturns Trial Court Decree State Cannot Seize Property Without Proving Owner Died Heirless: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Escheat Proceedings for Procedural Lapses Reasonableness of Business Expenditure Must Be Judged From the Businessman’s Perspective, Not the Revenue’s: Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee’s Appeal in Infrastructure Fee Dispute Delay in Filing Does Not Invalidate a Will—Right to Probate is Continuous: Calcutta High Court Upholds Probate Despite 19-Year Delay Registration Alone Is No Guarantee of a Valid Will”: Delhi High Court Refuses Probate for Failure to Prove Attestation

No More Delays – Bring Your Witnesses Tomorrow or Lose the Chance Forever: Delhi High Court Warns Tenant in Eviction Case

15 April 2025 2:28 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Eviction Cases Filed on Grounds of Bona Fide Requirement Cannot Be Allowed to Linger Indefinitely,” - In a firm yet fair ruling passed on April 7, 2025, the Delhi High Court granted tenant Pramod Kumar Jain one final opportunity to examine his witnesses — namely neighbours and an MCD official — in an ongoing eviction case filed by his landlady Seema Gupta. However, Justice Manoj Jain warned unequivocally that this would be the last such chance and that no further indulgence would be entertained.

The eviction petition, which is now at the final argument stage, was filed by Seema Gupta citing bona fide need for the premises. The High Court was dealing with two connected petitions — CM(M) 3018/2024 and CM(M) 98/2025 — in which the tenant had sought permission to lead additional evidence.

“The respondent has fairly stated she has no objection to one opportunity being granted, provided there is no further delay in proceedings,” recorded the Court, while acknowledging the landlady’s concession. But the judge was equally mindful of the time-sensitive nature of such litigation. “The purpose of filing the eviction petition on the ground of bona fide requirement would be rendered infructuous if unnecessary delays are allowed,” Justice Jain observed.

The tenant’s counsel had submitted that he would himself ensure the presence of the concerned neighbours before the Rent Controller the following day. It was also submitted that the same MCD official was likely to appear in a connected eviction petition against another tenant, Salekh Chand Jain, and the High Court permitted the said official to be examined in the present matter as well, but only if he turned up on that date.

“If the MCD official appears before the Court tomorrow with relevant record, albeit in a different case, he shall be permitted to be examined in the present eviction petition,” said the Court, adding a clear warning — this was a one-time liberty.

“The petitions are disposed of with the express understanding that this is the last opportunity to lead evidence,” ruled the High Court, making it abundantly clear that delays in eviction matters, especially those based on genuine need, cannot be tolerated in perpetuity.

The Court reserved all rights and contentions of the parties and ordered that the proceedings continue before the learned Rent Controller without further delay.

Date of Decision: 07 April 2025
 

Latest News