Auction Purchaser Has No Vested Right Without Sale Confirmation: Calcutta HC Upholds Borrower’s Redemption Right Under Pre-Amendment SARFAESI Law Mere Breach of Promise to Marry Doesn’t Amount to Rape: Delhi High Court Acquits Man in False Rape Case Father Is the Natural Guardian After Mother’s Death, Mere Technicalities Cannot Override Welfare of Child: Orissa High Court Restores Custody to Biological Father Assets of Wife and Father-in-Law Can Be Considered in Disproportionate Assets Case Against Public Servant: Kerala High Court Refuses Discharge Identification Without TIP, Electronic Records Without 65B Certificate – Conviction Set Aside: Patna High Court Nothing Inflicts A Deeper Wound On Our Constitutional Culture Than A State Official Running Berserk Regardless Of Human Rights: Jharkhand High Court Orders ₹1.5 Lakh Interim Compensation Dishonour Due to ‘Account Blocked’ Not Attributable to Drawer—No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Cannot Be Rebutted By Mere Assertions: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction In 32-Year-Old Cheque Bounce Case Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case, Rejects Blanket Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Justice Cannot Be Left to Guesswork: Supreme Court Mandates Structured Judgments in Criminal Trials Across India Truth Must Be Proven Beyond Doubt—Not Built On Flawed FIRs, Tainted Witnesses And Investigative Gaps: Supreme Court Acquits Man in POCSO Rape-Murder Case Once parties agree and reconciliation is impossible, a fault-based decree is unnecessary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Divorce on Desertion No Escape from Statutory Ceiling: Exclusive Expenditure by Foreign Head Offices Also Attracts Section 44C Income Tax: Supreme Court Loss Of A Child Cannot Be Calculated In Rupees, But Law Must At Least Offer Dignity In Compensation: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation Sessions Court Cannot Direct Life Imprisonment Till Natural Life Without Remission: Supreme Court Reasserts Limits on Sentencing Powers of Subordinate Courts ‘Continuously Means Without a Single Break’: Supreme Court Bars Expired-and-Renewed Licences From Police Driver Recruitment Chief Justice’s Power Under Section 51(3) Is Independent and Continuing: Supreme Court Upholds Kolhapur Bench Notification Last Seen Evidence Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case No Cultivation on Forest Land Without Central Clearance: Supreme Court Cancels Lease Over 134 Acres, Orders Reforestation Appointment from Rank List Must Respect Communal Rotation: SC Declines Claim of SC Waitlisted Candidate After Resignation of Appointee Supreme Court Dissolves 20-Year Estranged Marriage Under Article 142 Despite Wife’s Objection Murder Inside Temple Cannot Be Treated Lightly: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Father-Son Convicts in Group Killing Case No Notice, No Blacklist: Calcutta High Court Quashes Debarment Over Breach of Natural Justice Prosecution Must Elevate Its Case From Realm Of ‘May Be True’ To Plane Of ‘Must Be True: Orissa High Court Strict Compliance Is the Rule, Not Exception: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Tenant's Plea for Late Deposit of Rent Arrears When Accused Neither Denies Signature Nor Rebuts Presumption, Conviction Must Follow Under Section 138 NI Act: Karnataka High Court A Guardian Who Violates, Forfeits Mercy: Kerala High Court Upholds Natural Life Sentence in Stepfather–POCSO Rape Case Married and Earning Sons Are Legal Representatives Entitled to Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Motor Accident Award to ₹14.81 Lakh Driver Must Stop, Render Aid & Report Accident – Flight from Scene Is an Offence: Madras High Court Convicts Hit-And-Run Accused Under MV Act Delay May Shut the Door, But Justice Cannot Be Locked Out: Gauhati High Court Admits Union of India’s Arbitration Appeal Despite Time-Bar Under Section 30 PC Act | Mere Recovery of Money Is Not Enough—Demand and Acceptance Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Delhi High Court Allahabad High Court Slams Bar Council of U.P. for Ex Parte 10-Year Suspension of Advocate

No More Delays – Bring Your Witnesses Tomorrow or Lose the Chance Forever: Delhi High Court Warns Tenant in Eviction Case

15 April 2025 2:28 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Eviction Cases Filed on Grounds of Bona Fide Requirement Cannot Be Allowed to Linger Indefinitely,” - In a firm yet fair ruling passed on April 7, 2025, the Delhi High Court granted tenant Pramod Kumar Jain one final opportunity to examine his witnesses — namely neighbours and an MCD official — in an ongoing eviction case filed by his landlady Seema Gupta. However, Justice Manoj Jain warned unequivocally that this would be the last such chance and that no further indulgence would be entertained.

The eviction petition, which is now at the final argument stage, was filed by Seema Gupta citing bona fide need for the premises. The High Court was dealing with two connected petitions — CM(M) 3018/2024 and CM(M) 98/2025 — in which the tenant had sought permission to lead additional evidence.

“The respondent has fairly stated she has no objection to one opportunity being granted, provided there is no further delay in proceedings,” recorded the Court, while acknowledging the landlady’s concession. But the judge was equally mindful of the time-sensitive nature of such litigation. “The purpose of filing the eviction petition on the ground of bona fide requirement would be rendered infructuous if unnecessary delays are allowed,” Justice Jain observed.

The tenant’s counsel had submitted that he would himself ensure the presence of the concerned neighbours before the Rent Controller the following day. It was also submitted that the same MCD official was likely to appear in a connected eviction petition against another tenant, Salekh Chand Jain, and the High Court permitted the said official to be examined in the present matter as well, but only if he turned up on that date.

“If the MCD official appears before the Court tomorrow with relevant record, albeit in a different case, he shall be permitted to be examined in the present eviction petition,” said the Court, adding a clear warning — this was a one-time liberty.

“The petitions are disposed of with the express understanding that this is the last opportunity to lead evidence,” ruled the High Court, making it abundantly clear that delays in eviction matters, especially those based on genuine need, cannot be tolerated in perpetuity.

The Court reserved all rights and contentions of the parties and ordered that the proceedings continue before the learned Rent Controller without further delay.

Date of Decision: 07 April 2025
 

Latest Legal News